Extension of Splitting Fields over An Arbitrary Field












4












$begingroup$


Let $F$ be a field in which $0 neq2$ in $F$, and consider $f=x^4+1$. If $E$ is the splitting field for $f$ over $F$, it turns out that $E$ is a simple extension of $F$. How does one realize this fact? I'm not so sure as to what field element I can adjoin to $F$ to allow $f$ to split into linear factors. Finding the splitting field over something like $mathbb{Q}$ is straight forward and easy in comparison, but I'm having trouble working with any general field $F$.



Also, if we indeed did have that $0=2$ in our field $F$, then $f=x^4+1=(x+1)^4$, so $F$ is its own splitting field, is this correct reasoning?






abstract-algebra field-theory extension-field splitting-field







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Letting $alpha$ be any root, then $f$ splits as $(x-alpha)(x+alpha)(x-alpha^3)(x+alpha^3)$ in $F[alpha]$.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Earnest
    54 mins ago


















4












$begingroup$


Let $F$ be a field in which $0 neq2$ in $F$, and consider $f=x^4+1$. If $E$ is the splitting field for $f$ over $F$, it turns out that $E$ is a simple extension of $F$. How does one realize this fact? I'm not so sure as to what field element I can adjoin to $F$ to allow $f$ to split into linear factors. Finding the splitting field over something like $mathbb{Q}$ is straight forward and easy in comparison, but I'm having trouble working with any general field $F$.



Also, if we indeed did have that $0=2$ in our field $F$, then $f=x^4+1=(x+1)^4$, so $F$ is its own splitting field, is this correct reasoning?






abstract-algebra field-theory extension-field splitting-field







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Letting $alpha$ be any root, then $f$ splits as $(x-alpha)(x+alpha)(x-alpha^3)(x+alpha^3)$ in $F[alpha]$.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Earnest
    54 mins ago
















4












4








4


0



$begingroup$


Let $F$ be a field in which $0 neq2$ in $F$, and consider $f=x^4+1$. If $E$ is the splitting field for $f$ over $F$, it turns out that $E$ is a simple extension of $F$. How does one realize this fact? I'm not so sure as to what field element I can adjoin to $F$ to allow $f$ to split into linear factors. Finding the splitting field over something like $mathbb{Q}$ is straight forward and easy in comparison, but I'm having trouble working with any general field $F$.



Also, if we indeed did have that $0=2$ in our field $F$, then $f=x^4+1=(x+1)^4$, so $F$ is its own splitting field, is this correct reasoning?






abstract-algebra field-theory extension-field splitting-field







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Let $F$ be a field in which $0 neq2$ in $F$, and consider $f=x^4+1$. If $E$ is the splitting field for $f$ over $F$, it turns out that $E$ is a simple extension of $F$. How does one realize this fact? I'm not so sure as to what field element I can adjoin to $F$ to allow $f$ to split into linear factors. Finding the splitting field over something like $mathbb{Q}$ is straight forward and easy in comparison, but I'm having trouble working with any general field $F$.



Also, if we indeed did have that $0=2$ in our field $F$, then $f=x^4+1=(x+1)^4$, so $F$ is its own splitting field, is this correct reasoning?






abstract-algebra field-theory extension-field splitting-field




abstract-algebra field-theory extension-field splitting-field






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 1 hour ago









DevilofHell'sKitchenDevilofHell'sKitchen

405




405








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Letting $alpha$ be any root, then $f$ splits as $(x-alpha)(x+alpha)(x-alpha^3)(x+alpha^3)$ in $F[alpha]$.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Earnest
    54 mins ago
















  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Letting $alpha$ be any root, then $f$ splits as $(x-alpha)(x+alpha)(x-alpha^3)(x+alpha^3)$ in $F[alpha]$.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Earnest
    54 mins ago










2




2




$begingroup$
Letting $alpha$ be any root, then $f$ splits as $(x-alpha)(x+alpha)(x-alpha^3)(x+alpha^3)$ in $F[alpha]$.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
54 mins ago






$begingroup$
Letting $alpha$ be any root, then $f$ splits as $(x-alpha)(x+alpha)(x-alpha^3)(x+alpha^3)$ in $F[alpha]$.
$endgroup$
– Mike Earnest
54 mins ago












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















5












$begingroup$

If $theta$ is a root of $x^4+1$, then so are $theta^k$ for $k=1,3,5,7$, and so $x^4+1$ splits in $F(theta)$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    And those powers of $theta$ are distinct elements of the field.
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    47 mins ago











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3147449%2fextension-of-splitting-fields-over-an-arbitrary-field%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









5












$begingroup$

If $theta$ is a root of $x^4+1$, then so are $theta^k$ for $k=1,3,5,7$, and so $x^4+1$ splits in $F(theta)$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    And those powers of $theta$ are distinct elements of the field.
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    47 mins ago
















5












$begingroup$

If $theta$ is a root of $x^4+1$, then so are $theta^k$ for $k=1,3,5,7$, and so $x^4+1$ splits in $F(theta)$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    And those powers of $theta$ are distinct elements of the field.
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    47 mins ago














5












5








5





$begingroup$

If $theta$ is a root of $x^4+1$, then so are $theta^k$ for $k=1,3,5,7$, and so $x^4+1$ splits in $F(theta)$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



If $theta$ is a root of $x^4+1$, then so are $theta^k$ for $k=1,3,5,7$, and so $x^4+1$ splits in $F(theta)$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered 59 mins ago









lhflhf

166k10171400




166k10171400








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    And those powers of $theta$ are distinct elements of the field.
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    47 mins ago














  • 2




    $begingroup$
    And those powers of $theta$ are distinct elements of the field.
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    47 mins ago








2




2




$begingroup$
And those powers of $theta$ are distinct elements of the field.
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
47 mins ago




$begingroup$
And those powers of $theta$ are distinct elements of the field.
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
47 mins ago


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3147449%2fextension-of-splitting-fields-over-an-arbitrary-field%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

Knooppunt Holsloot

Image
Knooppunt Holsloot Kenmerken Wegen A37 × N34 Type knooppunt klaverblad Portaal     Verkeer & Vervoer Knooppunt Holsloot is een verkeersknooppunt op de kruising van de autosnelweg A37 en de N34 in Drenthe, tussen Emmen en Coevorden. Oorspronkelijk was deze aansluiting een afritconstructie van het type Haarlemmermeeraansluiting, zoals bij Knooppunt Hooipolder. Sinds 2002 is het knooppunt omgebouwd tot een volledig klaverblad. Als noviteit werd hier voor het eerst gebruikgemaakt van dimbare verlichting in plaats van de normale vaste tijden waarop de verlichting aan en uit gaat, wat een grote kostenbesparing opleverde. [1] Dat Holsloot als volwaardig knooppunt is uitgevoerd, waarbij alle verkeersstromen en afbuigingen ononderbroken kunnen doorgaan, is uitzonderlijk. Het betreft hier namelijk een aansluiting tussen een autosnelweg en niet-snelweg. Een vergelijkbare situatie treft men nabij Hoensbroek bij het knooppunt Ten Esschen.     Aa
Read more

Altaar (religie)

Image
Deel van de serie over kerkelijk gerei waaronder paramenten en liturgisch vaatwerk gebruikt in de liturgie Liturgisch vaatwerk Vasa sacra Miskelk · Pateen Kelklepeltje Ciborie · Monstrans Pyxis · Custodiale Vasa non sacra Ampullen · Wijwatervat Olievaatje Wierookvat · Ablutievat Paramenten Amict · Albe · Baarkleed · Cingel Tuniek · Dalmatiek · Fanon Kazuifel · Manipel · Stola Gremiale · Benedictievelum Mijter Koorkledij Rochet · Superplie Koorkap · Cappa magna Kovel Kelkgerei Bursa · Kelkvelum Ciborievelum Kerklinnen Corporale · Kelkdoekje Lavabodoekje · Palla Altaardwaal Kerkinterieur Altaar · Ambo Biechtstoel · Communiebank Doksaal · Doopvont Faldistorium Godslamp · Hoogaltaar Heilig Kruisaltaar Katheder · Preekstoel Sedilia Tabernakel · Volksaltaar Liturgische boeken Altaarmissaal Benedictionale · Brevier Evangeliarium · Evangelistarium Graduale · Kyriale Lectionarium Psalter · Rituaal Sacramentarium · Volksmissaal Overige Flambou
Read more

Gregoriusmis

Image
Een afbeelding van de Gregoriusmis uit een getijdenboek gemaakt in de zuidelijke Nederlanden tussen 1500 en 1525 Gregoriusmis, Meester van het Akense Altaar, ca. 1500-1525. Collectie Museum Catharijneconvent De Gregoriusmis of de Mis van Sint Gregorius is een motief in katholieke kunst, dat het eerst verscheen in de late Middeleeuwen en dat nog steeds werd gebruikt tijdens de contrareformatie. Paus Gregorius I (ca. 540-604) is afgebeeld, de H. Mis opdragend, terwijl Christus als de Man van Smarten verschijnt op het altaar dat voor Sint Gregorius staat. Volgens de legende had St. Gregorius gebeden om een teken voor een betwijfelaar van de transsubstantiatieleer, waarop de lijdende Christus tijdens het opdragen van de Mis verscheen om hem te overtuigen en waarbij zijn bloed in de altaarkelk liep. Vaak zijn ook de passiewerktuigen afgebeeld. Zie de categorie Mass of Saint Gregory van Wikimedia Commons voor mediabestanden over dit onderwerp. This page is onl
Read more