Are the Redwall creatures their natural real-world size?
One thing that always confused me about the books was the question of scale. You have everything from shrews to badgers living together, working together, fighting together. Are these animals the same size as in the real world, or more human-scaled relative to their environment?
I realize that there are some discrepancies between Redwall and the rest of the series, such as Cluny's entire army riding in a horse-drawn cart which suggests natural scale in a human-populated world. However the later books exclude references to large and/or domesticated animals and potential human activity. So once this change is taken into account, are the animals still assumed to be realistically scaled?
Otters and badgers are said to be huge, for example, but that could just be in the sense that Andre the Giant was huge compared to most people. I seem to recall a few mentions of distance but that would be easily explained as their own units of measurement either way.
I imagine that the animals were roughly human sized, otherwise their size differences would be too great for them to cohabitate and the scale of the world would make much of what they do impractical. Is there a canonical answer or enough evidence to reach a conclusion?
animals redwall
add a comment |
One thing that always confused me about the books was the question of scale. You have everything from shrews to badgers living together, working together, fighting together. Are these animals the same size as in the real world, or more human-scaled relative to their environment?
I realize that there are some discrepancies between Redwall and the rest of the series, such as Cluny's entire army riding in a horse-drawn cart which suggests natural scale in a human-populated world. However the later books exclude references to large and/or domesticated animals and potential human activity. So once this change is taken into account, are the animals still assumed to be realistically scaled?
Otters and badgers are said to be huge, for example, but that could just be in the sense that Andre the Giant was huge compared to most people. I seem to recall a few mentions of distance but that would be easily explained as their own units of measurement either way.
I imagine that the animals were roughly human sized, otherwise their size differences would be too great for them to cohabitate and the scale of the world would make much of what they do impractical. Is there a canonical answer or enough evidence to reach a conclusion?
animals redwall
add a comment |
One thing that always confused me about the books was the question of scale. You have everything from shrews to badgers living together, working together, fighting together. Are these animals the same size as in the real world, or more human-scaled relative to their environment?
I realize that there are some discrepancies between Redwall and the rest of the series, such as Cluny's entire army riding in a horse-drawn cart which suggests natural scale in a human-populated world. However the later books exclude references to large and/or domesticated animals and potential human activity. So once this change is taken into account, are the animals still assumed to be realistically scaled?
Otters and badgers are said to be huge, for example, but that could just be in the sense that Andre the Giant was huge compared to most people. I seem to recall a few mentions of distance but that would be easily explained as their own units of measurement either way.
I imagine that the animals were roughly human sized, otherwise their size differences would be too great for them to cohabitate and the scale of the world would make much of what they do impractical. Is there a canonical answer or enough evidence to reach a conclusion?
animals redwall
One thing that always confused me about the books was the question of scale. You have everything from shrews to badgers living together, working together, fighting together. Are these animals the same size as in the real world, or more human-scaled relative to their environment?
I realize that there are some discrepancies between Redwall and the rest of the series, such as Cluny's entire army riding in a horse-drawn cart which suggests natural scale in a human-populated world. However the later books exclude references to large and/or domesticated animals and potential human activity. So once this change is taken into account, are the animals still assumed to be realistically scaled?
Otters and badgers are said to be huge, for example, but that could just be in the sense that Andre the Giant was huge compared to most people. I seem to recall a few mentions of distance but that would be easily explained as their own units of measurement either way.
I imagine that the animals were roughly human sized, otherwise their size differences would be too great for them to cohabitate and the scale of the world would make much of what they do impractical. Is there a canonical answer or enough evidence to reach a conclusion?
animals redwall
animals redwall
edited Feb 6 '17 at 1:06
Rand al'Thor♦
98k43465654
98k43465654
asked Jan 24 '14 at 16:34
Travis ChristianTravis Christian
5,35943856
5,35943856
add a comment |
add a comment |
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
According the the FAQ on Brian Jacques' official Redwall website, the animals in the Redwall series have no clearly defined size:
Q: Do the animals in your stories walk on all fours or, do they walk erect?
BJ: The creatures in my stories are as big or small as your imagination wants them to be. My imagination does not see them on
all fours.
1
Well that settles it.
– Travis Christian
May 30 '15 at 15:44
add a comment |
My understanding when reading the books is that they are all similar in size. Mice are smaller than badgers but in the same way a normal dude is smaller than Andre the Giant. I think that it becomes much more standardized in the later books. RedWall had the most discrepancies, however it seems to be implied that they are not human sized, that is why Pikes are such deadly fish. So, to summarize, they are all small woodland creatures scaled together but not scaled to human proportions.
+1 for Redwall being the most inconstant. Adders and Pikes were huge but rats could drive a cart!
– Liath
Jun 30 '17 at 7:34
add a comment |
I believe the animals are all similar sizes. Mice, hares, badgers, and otters all fit comfortably in all the rooms in Redwall Abbey and Salamandastron. Some animals are larger then others but its only by a fairly small amount. Armed mice are able to dual foxes and Badgers don't have as easy a time fighting rats as their real world size differences would cause.
add a comment |
In Redwall however, a cat swallows Matthias whole, indicating a large size difference.
Additionally, Matthias needs the aid of Constance the badger to move a 2 pound fish, which feeds the whole abbey.
Additionally, the crab and eel in mossflower were described as much larger than gnoff, martin, and dinny.
There is a size difference but it is much more pronounced in Redwall than other books.
add a comment |
In addition to what has been given, in the television show there are instances of discrepancies in size. For instance there is a cat in seen hunting Matthias and Myrtle (5 min into the first episode of season 1) and the horse Cluny rides in on seems to be near the size of a real horse (although the relative size of Cluny is much larger than a normal rat in this scene, around 15 min in). Not sure if television is able to make decisions on canon though.
New contributor
add a comment |
The sharks in The Bellmaker are described as as big as the ship the Pearl Queen.
3
D'you mind adding the quote from the book that describes this? Thanks!
– Mithrandir
Jun 30 '17 at 7:22
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "186"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f48832%2fare-the-redwall-creatures-their-natural-real-world-size%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
According the the FAQ on Brian Jacques' official Redwall website, the animals in the Redwall series have no clearly defined size:
Q: Do the animals in your stories walk on all fours or, do they walk erect?
BJ: The creatures in my stories are as big or small as your imagination wants them to be. My imagination does not see them on
all fours.
1
Well that settles it.
– Travis Christian
May 30 '15 at 15:44
add a comment |
According the the FAQ on Brian Jacques' official Redwall website, the animals in the Redwall series have no clearly defined size:
Q: Do the animals in your stories walk on all fours or, do they walk erect?
BJ: The creatures in my stories are as big or small as your imagination wants them to be. My imagination does not see them on
all fours.
1
Well that settles it.
– Travis Christian
May 30 '15 at 15:44
add a comment |
According the the FAQ on Brian Jacques' official Redwall website, the animals in the Redwall series have no clearly defined size:
Q: Do the animals in your stories walk on all fours or, do they walk erect?
BJ: The creatures in my stories are as big or small as your imagination wants them to be. My imagination does not see them on
all fours.
According the the FAQ on Brian Jacques' official Redwall website, the animals in the Redwall series have no clearly defined size:
Q: Do the animals in your stories walk on all fours or, do they walk erect?
BJ: The creatures in my stories are as big or small as your imagination wants them to be. My imagination does not see them on
all fours.
answered May 30 '15 at 15:29
ValorumValorum
409k11029713196
409k11029713196
1
Well that settles it.
– Travis Christian
May 30 '15 at 15:44
add a comment |
1
Well that settles it.
– Travis Christian
May 30 '15 at 15:44
1
1
Well that settles it.
– Travis Christian
May 30 '15 at 15:44
Well that settles it.
– Travis Christian
May 30 '15 at 15:44
add a comment |
My understanding when reading the books is that they are all similar in size. Mice are smaller than badgers but in the same way a normal dude is smaller than Andre the Giant. I think that it becomes much more standardized in the later books. RedWall had the most discrepancies, however it seems to be implied that they are not human sized, that is why Pikes are such deadly fish. So, to summarize, they are all small woodland creatures scaled together but not scaled to human proportions.
+1 for Redwall being the most inconstant. Adders and Pikes were huge but rats could drive a cart!
– Liath
Jun 30 '17 at 7:34
add a comment |
My understanding when reading the books is that they are all similar in size. Mice are smaller than badgers but in the same way a normal dude is smaller than Andre the Giant. I think that it becomes much more standardized in the later books. RedWall had the most discrepancies, however it seems to be implied that they are not human sized, that is why Pikes are such deadly fish. So, to summarize, they are all small woodland creatures scaled together but not scaled to human proportions.
+1 for Redwall being the most inconstant. Adders and Pikes were huge but rats could drive a cart!
– Liath
Jun 30 '17 at 7:34
add a comment |
My understanding when reading the books is that they are all similar in size. Mice are smaller than badgers but in the same way a normal dude is smaller than Andre the Giant. I think that it becomes much more standardized in the later books. RedWall had the most discrepancies, however it seems to be implied that they are not human sized, that is why Pikes are such deadly fish. So, to summarize, they are all small woodland creatures scaled together but not scaled to human proportions.
My understanding when reading the books is that they are all similar in size. Mice are smaller than badgers but in the same way a normal dude is smaller than Andre the Giant. I think that it becomes much more standardized in the later books. RedWall had the most discrepancies, however it seems to be implied that they are not human sized, that is why Pikes are such deadly fish. So, to summarize, they are all small woodland creatures scaled together but not scaled to human proportions.
answered Jan 24 '14 at 16:49
SkylerSkyler
211
211
+1 for Redwall being the most inconstant. Adders and Pikes were huge but rats could drive a cart!
– Liath
Jun 30 '17 at 7:34
add a comment |
+1 for Redwall being the most inconstant. Adders and Pikes were huge but rats could drive a cart!
– Liath
Jun 30 '17 at 7:34
+1 for Redwall being the most inconstant. Adders and Pikes were huge but rats could drive a cart!
– Liath
Jun 30 '17 at 7:34
+1 for Redwall being the most inconstant. Adders and Pikes were huge but rats could drive a cart!
– Liath
Jun 30 '17 at 7:34
add a comment |
I believe the animals are all similar sizes. Mice, hares, badgers, and otters all fit comfortably in all the rooms in Redwall Abbey and Salamandastron. Some animals are larger then others but its only by a fairly small amount. Armed mice are able to dual foxes and Badgers don't have as easy a time fighting rats as their real world size differences would cause.
add a comment |
I believe the animals are all similar sizes. Mice, hares, badgers, and otters all fit comfortably in all the rooms in Redwall Abbey and Salamandastron. Some animals are larger then others but its only by a fairly small amount. Armed mice are able to dual foxes and Badgers don't have as easy a time fighting rats as their real world size differences would cause.
add a comment |
I believe the animals are all similar sizes. Mice, hares, badgers, and otters all fit comfortably in all the rooms in Redwall Abbey and Salamandastron. Some animals are larger then others but its only by a fairly small amount. Armed mice are able to dual foxes and Badgers don't have as easy a time fighting rats as their real world size differences would cause.
I believe the animals are all similar sizes. Mice, hares, badgers, and otters all fit comfortably in all the rooms in Redwall Abbey and Salamandastron. Some animals are larger then others but its only by a fairly small amount. Armed mice are able to dual foxes and Badgers don't have as easy a time fighting rats as their real world size differences would cause.
answered Jan 28 '14 at 1:23
sevvacksevvack
785716
785716
add a comment |
add a comment |
In Redwall however, a cat swallows Matthias whole, indicating a large size difference.
Additionally, Matthias needs the aid of Constance the badger to move a 2 pound fish, which feeds the whole abbey.
Additionally, the crab and eel in mossflower were described as much larger than gnoff, martin, and dinny.
There is a size difference but it is much more pronounced in Redwall than other books.
add a comment |
In Redwall however, a cat swallows Matthias whole, indicating a large size difference.
Additionally, Matthias needs the aid of Constance the badger to move a 2 pound fish, which feeds the whole abbey.
Additionally, the crab and eel in mossflower were described as much larger than gnoff, martin, and dinny.
There is a size difference but it is much more pronounced in Redwall than other books.
add a comment |
In Redwall however, a cat swallows Matthias whole, indicating a large size difference.
Additionally, Matthias needs the aid of Constance the badger to move a 2 pound fish, which feeds the whole abbey.
Additionally, the crab and eel in mossflower were described as much larger than gnoff, martin, and dinny.
There is a size difference but it is much more pronounced in Redwall than other books.
In Redwall however, a cat swallows Matthias whole, indicating a large size difference.
Additionally, Matthias needs the aid of Constance the badger to move a 2 pound fish, which feeds the whole abbey.
Additionally, the crab and eel in mossflower were described as much larger than gnoff, martin, and dinny.
There is a size difference but it is much more pronounced in Redwall than other books.
edited Jul 28 '16 at 16:28
Null♦
54.3k18229312
54.3k18229312
answered Jul 28 '16 at 16:10
boxbotboxbot
1
1
add a comment |
add a comment |
In addition to what has been given, in the television show there are instances of discrepancies in size. For instance there is a cat in seen hunting Matthias and Myrtle (5 min into the first episode of season 1) and the horse Cluny rides in on seems to be near the size of a real horse (although the relative size of Cluny is much larger than a normal rat in this scene, around 15 min in). Not sure if television is able to make decisions on canon though.
New contributor
add a comment |
In addition to what has been given, in the television show there are instances of discrepancies in size. For instance there is a cat in seen hunting Matthias and Myrtle (5 min into the first episode of season 1) and the horse Cluny rides in on seems to be near the size of a real horse (although the relative size of Cluny is much larger than a normal rat in this scene, around 15 min in). Not sure if television is able to make decisions on canon though.
New contributor
add a comment |
In addition to what has been given, in the television show there are instances of discrepancies in size. For instance there is a cat in seen hunting Matthias and Myrtle (5 min into the first episode of season 1) and the horse Cluny rides in on seems to be near the size of a real horse (although the relative size of Cluny is much larger than a normal rat in this scene, around 15 min in). Not sure if television is able to make decisions on canon though.
New contributor
In addition to what has been given, in the television show there are instances of discrepancies in size. For instance there is a cat in seen hunting Matthias and Myrtle (5 min into the first episode of season 1) and the horse Cluny rides in on seems to be near the size of a real horse (although the relative size of Cluny is much larger than a normal rat in this scene, around 15 min in). Not sure if television is able to make decisions on canon though.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 10 mins ago
WnGatRC456WnGatRC456
11
11
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
The sharks in The Bellmaker are described as as big as the ship the Pearl Queen.
3
D'you mind adding the quote from the book that describes this? Thanks!
– Mithrandir
Jun 30 '17 at 7:22
add a comment |
The sharks in The Bellmaker are described as as big as the ship the Pearl Queen.
3
D'you mind adding the quote from the book that describes this? Thanks!
– Mithrandir
Jun 30 '17 at 7:22
add a comment |
The sharks in The Bellmaker are described as as big as the ship the Pearl Queen.
The sharks in The Bellmaker are described as as big as the ship the Pearl Queen.
edited Jun 30 '17 at 7:18
sjl
4,31412140
4,31412140
answered Jun 30 '17 at 6:52
DubTheNarwhalsDubTheNarwhals
1
1
3
D'you mind adding the quote from the book that describes this? Thanks!
– Mithrandir
Jun 30 '17 at 7:22
add a comment |
3
D'you mind adding the quote from the book that describes this? Thanks!
– Mithrandir
Jun 30 '17 at 7:22
3
3
D'you mind adding the quote from the book that describes this? Thanks!
– Mithrandir
Jun 30 '17 at 7:22
D'you mind adding the quote from the book that describes this? Thanks!
– Mithrandir
Jun 30 '17 at 7:22
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f48832%2fare-the-redwall-creatures-their-natural-real-world-size%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown