What is the theoretical maximal material difference of a dead draw which is not a stalemate?
I have noticed the following example, which should be a dead draw:
I am wondering what is the theoretical material difference of a dead draw which is not a stalemate? (I am not asking about agreed draws.) Apparently we could not add more rooks to the diagram as all white pawns have not been promoted.
By the way, the game above is not drawn by the insufficient material rule, as white can theoretically win the game if black makes a blunder such as capturing the rook.
theory draw
add a comment |
I have noticed the following example, which should be a dead draw:
I am wondering what is the theoretical material difference of a dead draw which is not a stalemate? (I am not asking about agreed draws.) Apparently we could not add more rooks to the diagram as all white pawns have not been promoted.
By the way, the game above is not drawn by the insufficient material rule, as white can theoretically win the game if black makes a blunder such as capturing the rook.
theory draw
1
I believe if you add a white queen on a1 or b1 or b2 and a black knight on b5 it would still be draw (if you capture on a3 or c3 I am going to recapture with the knight).
– user1583209
2 hours ago
add a comment |
I have noticed the following example, which should be a dead draw:
I am wondering what is the theoretical material difference of a dead draw which is not a stalemate? (I am not asking about agreed draws.) Apparently we could not add more rooks to the diagram as all white pawns have not been promoted.
By the way, the game above is not drawn by the insufficient material rule, as white can theoretically win the game if black makes a blunder such as capturing the rook.
theory draw
I have noticed the following example, which should be a dead draw:
I am wondering what is the theoretical material difference of a dead draw which is not a stalemate? (I am not asking about agreed draws.) Apparently we could not add more rooks to the diagram as all white pawns have not been promoted.
By the way, the game above is not drawn by the insufficient material rule, as white can theoretically win the game if black makes a blunder such as capturing the rook.
theory draw
theory draw
edited 2 hours ago
Zuriel
asked 3 hours ago
ZurielZuriel
503210
503210
1
I believe if you add a white queen on a1 or b1 or b2 and a black knight on b5 it would still be draw (if you capture on a3 or c3 I am going to recapture with the knight).
– user1583209
2 hours ago
add a comment |
1
I believe if you add a white queen on a1 or b1 or b2 and a black knight on b5 it would still be draw (if you capture on a3 or c3 I am going to recapture with the knight).
– user1583209
2 hours ago
1
1
I believe if you add a white queen on a1 or b1 or b2 and a black knight on b5 it would still be draw (if you capture on a3 or c3 I am going to recapture with the knight).
– user1583209
2 hours ago
I believe if you add a white queen on a1 or b1 or b2 and a black knight on b5 it would still be draw (if you capture on a3 or c3 I am going to recapture with the knight).
– user1583209
2 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
With white to move, the following position is a draw:
I think it's reachable from the original position, although it would be difficult. I'll let you know if I can.
Heh, that idea works too, but I'm not sure if the OP wants to include perpetual check or not.
– Glorfindel
2 hours ago
Yeah, I'm not sure, either, but since he didn't specify, I felt obligated.
– Brandon_J
2 hours ago
2
I am the OP and I am not sure as well. Since I am not sure, theoretically no one knows for sure whether the OP wants to include perpetual check or not.
– Zuriel
2 hours ago
hahaha this could get awkward
– Brandon_J
2 hours ago
1
You could improve this by replacing the rook with a minor piece. A possible perpetual could be for instance: black Bf8, Ng7, Kh8; white: Nf7+, Kg6 and the knight is shuffling between h6 and f7. I am sure you can place 9 queens and the rest of the material somewhere on the board so that it does not interfere with the perpetual.
– user1583209
1 hour ago
add a comment |
This position, with a material difference of 1 queen, 2 rooks, a bishop and a knight, is (quite easily) reachable from the starting position:
7k/8/8/1n6/1p1p1p1p/pPpPpPpP/P1P1P1P1/RQNKNB1R w - - 0 1
You could add a white bishop on g1 and a black knight on f5, but the material difference remains the same.
Assuming white only moves its rook back and forth, black could play Nd6, Nc4, and Nb2. From there the (strange) line Qxb2 Kg8 Qb1 is also a draw with one less knight.
– Brandon_J
2 hours ago
1
@Brandon_J: Without the black knight, white would play Qb2 and then Qxa3 (or Qxc3) and then it s not a draw anymore.
– user1583209
1 hour ago
Ahhh...would never have seen Qb2 for white
– Brandon_J
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "435"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchess.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f23522%2fwhat-is-the-theoretical-maximal-material-difference-of-a-dead-draw-which-is-not%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
With white to move, the following position is a draw:
I think it's reachable from the original position, although it would be difficult. I'll let you know if I can.
Heh, that idea works too, but I'm not sure if the OP wants to include perpetual check or not.
– Glorfindel
2 hours ago
Yeah, I'm not sure, either, but since he didn't specify, I felt obligated.
– Brandon_J
2 hours ago
2
I am the OP and I am not sure as well. Since I am not sure, theoretically no one knows for sure whether the OP wants to include perpetual check or not.
– Zuriel
2 hours ago
hahaha this could get awkward
– Brandon_J
2 hours ago
1
You could improve this by replacing the rook with a minor piece. A possible perpetual could be for instance: black Bf8, Ng7, Kh8; white: Nf7+, Kg6 and the knight is shuffling between h6 and f7. I am sure you can place 9 queens and the rest of the material somewhere on the board so that it does not interfere with the perpetual.
– user1583209
1 hour ago
add a comment |
With white to move, the following position is a draw:
I think it's reachable from the original position, although it would be difficult. I'll let you know if I can.
Heh, that idea works too, but I'm not sure if the OP wants to include perpetual check or not.
– Glorfindel
2 hours ago
Yeah, I'm not sure, either, but since he didn't specify, I felt obligated.
– Brandon_J
2 hours ago
2
I am the OP and I am not sure as well. Since I am not sure, theoretically no one knows for sure whether the OP wants to include perpetual check or not.
– Zuriel
2 hours ago
hahaha this could get awkward
– Brandon_J
2 hours ago
1
You could improve this by replacing the rook with a minor piece. A possible perpetual could be for instance: black Bf8, Ng7, Kh8; white: Nf7+, Kg6 and the knight is shuffling between h6 and f7. I am sure you can place 9 queens and the rest of the material somewhere on the board so that it does not interfere with the perpetual.
– user1583209
1 hour ago
add a comment |
With white to move, the following position is a draw:
I think it's reachable from the original position, although it would be difficult. I'll let you know if I can.
With white to move, the following position is a draw:
I think it's reachable from the original position, although it would be difficult. I'll let you know if I can.
answered 2 hours ago
Brandon_JBrandon_J
2926
2926
Heh, that idea works too, but I'm not sure if the OP wants to include perpetual check or not.
– Glorfindel
2 hours ago
Yeah, I'm not sure, either, but since he didn't specify, I felt obligated.
– Brandon_J
2 hours ago
2
I am the OP and I am not sure as well. Since I am not sure, theoretically no one knows for sure whether the OP wants to include perpetual check or not.
– Zuriel
2 hours ago
hahaha this could get awkward
– Brandon_J
2 hours ago
1
You could improve this by replacing the rook with a minor piece. A possible perpetual could be for instance: black Bf8, Ng7, Kh8; white: Nf7+, Kg6 and the knight is shuffling between h6 and f7. I am sure you can place 9 queens and the rest of the material somewhere on the board so that it does not interfere with the perpetual.
– user1583209
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Heh, that idea works too, but I'm not sure if the OP wants to include perpetual check or not.
– Glorfindel
2 hours ago
Yeah, I'm not sure, either, but since he didn't specify, I felt obligated.
– Brandon_J
2 hours ago
2
I am the OP and I am not sure as well. Since I am not sure, theoretically no one knows for sure whether the OP wants to include perpetual check or not.
– Zuriel
2 hours ago
hahaha this could get awkward
– Brandon_J
2 hours ago
1
You could improve this by replacing the rook with a minor piece. A possible perpetual could be for instance: black Bf8, Ng7, Kh8; white: Nf7+, Kg6 and the knight is shuffling between h6 and f7. I am sure you can place 9 queens and the rest of the material somewhere on the board so that it does not interfere with the perpetual.
– user1583209
1 hour ago
Heh, that idea works too, but I'm not sure if the OP wants to include perpetual check or not.
– Glorfindel
2 hours ago
Heh, that idea works too, but I'm not sure if the OP wants to include perpetual check or not.
– Glorfindel
2 hours ago
Yeah, I'm not sure, either, but since he didn't specify, I felt obligated.
– Brandon_J
2 hours ago
Yeah, I'm not sure, either, but since he didn't specify, I felt obligated.
– Brandon_J
2 hours ago
2
2
I am the OP and I am not sure as well. Since I am not sure, theoretically no one knows for sure whether the OP wants to include perpetual check or not.
– Zuriel
2 hours ago
I am the OP and I am not sure as well. Since I am not sure, theoretically no one knows for sure whether the OP wants to include perpetual check or not.
– Zuriel
2 hours ago
hahaha this could get awkward
– Brandon_J
2 hours ago
hahaha this could get awkward
– Brandon_J
2 hours ago
1
1
You could improve this by replacing the rook with a minor piece. A possible perpetual could be for instance: black Bf8, Ng7, Kh8; white: Nf7+, Kg6 and the knight is shuffling between h6 and f7. I am sure you can place 9 queens and the rest of the material somewhere on the board so that it does not interfere with the perpetual.
– user1583209
1 hour ago
You could improve this by replacing the rook with a minor piece. A possible perpetual could be for instance: black Bf8, Ng7, Kh8; white: Nf7+, Kg6 and the knight is shuffling between h6 and f7. I am sure you can place 9 queens and the rest of the material somewhere on the board so that it does not interfere with the perpetual.
– user1583209
1 hour ago
add a comment |
This position, with a material difference of 1 queen, 2 rooks, a bishop and a knight, is (quite easily) reachable from the starting position:
7k/8/8/1n6/1p1p1p1p/pPpPpPpP/P1P1P1P1/RQNKNB1R w - - 0 1
You could add a white bishop on g1 and a black knight on f5, but the material difference remains the same.
Assuming white only moves its rook back and forth, black could play Nd6, Nc4, and Nb2. From there the (strange) line Qxb2 Kg8 Qb1 is also a draw with one less knight.
– Brandon_J
2 hours ago
1
@Brandon_J: Without the black knight, white would play Qb2 and then Qxa3 (or Qxc3) and then it s not a draw anymore.
– user1583209
1 hour ago
Ahhh...would never have seen Qb2 for white
– Brandon_J
1 hour ago
add a comment |
This position, with a material difference of 1 queen, 2 rooks, a bishop and a knight, is (quite easily) reachable from the starting position:
7k/8/8/1n6/1p1p1p1p/pPpPpPpP/P1P1P1P1/RQNKNB1R w - - 0 1
You could add a white bishop on g1 and a black knight on f5, but the material difference remains the same.
Assuming white only moves its rook back and forth, black could play Nd6, Nc4, and Nb2. From there the (strange) line Qxb2 Kg8 Qb1 is also a draw with one less knight.
– Brandon_J
2 hours ago
1
@Brandon_J: Without the black knight, white would play Qb2 and then Qxa3 (or Qxc3) and then it s not a draw anymore.
– user1583209
1 hour ago
Ahhh...would never have seen Qb2 for white
– Brandon_J
1 hour ago
add a comment |
This position, with a material difference of 1 queen, 2 rooks, a bishop and a knight, is (quite easily) reachable from the starting position:
7k/8/8/1n6/1p1p1p1p/pPpPpPpP/P1P1P1P1/RQNKNB1R w - - 0 1
You could add a white bishop on g1 and a black knight on f5, but the material difference remains the same.
This position, with a material difference of 1 queen, 2 rooks, a bishop and a knight, is (quite easily) reachable from the starting position:
7k/8/8/1n6/1p1p1p1p/pPpPpPpP/P1P1P1P1/RQNKNB1R w - - 0 1
You could add a white bishop on g1 and a black knight on f5, but the material difference remains the same.
answered 2 hours ago
GlorfindelGlorfindel
12.9k43560
12.9k43560
Assuming white only moves its rook back and forth, black could play Nd6, Nc4, and Nb2. From there the (strange) line Qxb2 Kg8 Qb1 is also a draw with one less knight.
– Brandon_J
2 hours ago
1
@Brandon_J: Without the black knight, white would play Qb2 and then Qxa3 (or Qxc3) and then it s not a draw anymore.
– user1583209
1 hour ago
Ahhh...would never have seen Qb2 for white
– Brandon_J
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Assuming white only moves its rook back and forth, black could play Nd6, Nc4, and Nb2. From there the (strange) line Qxb2 Kg8 Qb1 is also a draw with one less knight.
– Brandon_J
2 hours ago
1
@Brandon_J: Without the black knight, white would play Qb2 and then Qxa3 (or Qxc3) and then it s not a draw anymore.
– user1583209
1 hour ago
Ahhh...would never have seen Qb2 for white
– Brandon_J
1 hour ago
Assuming white only moves its rook back and forth, black could play Nd6, Nc4, and Nb2. From there the (strange) line Qxb2 Kg8 Qb1 is also a draw with one less knight.
– Brandon_J
2 hours ago
Assuming white only moves its rook back and forth, black could play Nd6, Nc4, and Nb2. From there the (strange) line Qxb2 Kg8 Qb1 is also a draw with one less knight.
– Brandon_J
2 hours ago
1
1
@Brandon_J: Without the black knight, white would play Qb2 and then Qxa3 (or Qxc3) and then it s not a draw anymore.
– user1583209
1 hour ago
@Brandon_J: Without the black knight, white would play Qb2 and then Qxa3 (or Qxc3) and then it s not a draw anymore.
– user1583209
1 hour ago
Ahhh...would never have seen Qb2 for white
– Brandon_J
1 hour ago
Ahhh...would never have seen Qb2 for white
– Brandon_J
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Chess Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchess.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f23522%2fwhat-is-the-theoretical-maximal-material-difference-of-a-dead-draw-which-is-not%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
I believe if you add a white queen on a1 or b1 or b2 and a black knight on b5 it would still be draw (if you capture on a3 or c3 I am going to recapture with the knight).
– user1583209
2 hours ago