Did Prof. Quirrell's body house two fragments of Voldemort's soul?
From HP Wikia's "Horcrux" article:
J. K. Rowling revealed in Pottermore that Prof. Quirinus Quirrell served as a temporary Horcrux when Voldemort's soul possessed his body during Harry Potter's first year at Hogwarts. (source: Pottermore reveals Professor Quirrell's history & connection to Lord Voldemort)
QUESTION:
Seeing how at that point Quirrell was inhabited by the "main" fragment of Voldemort's soul (and that fact was something 100% clear and obvious from "HP&SS" book), does the statement above mean that somehow there actually were *two fragments of it in Quirrell, one "main" and one "Horcrux"?* If not, then what's the "reveal" part?
harry-potter voldemort horcrux
add a comment |
From HP Wikia's "Horcrux" article:
J. K. Rowling revealed in Pottermore that Prof. Quirinus Quirrell served as a temporary Horcrux when Voldemort's soul possessed his body during Harry Potter's first year at Hogwarts. (source: Pottermore reveals Professor Quirrell's history & connection to Lord Voldemort)
QUESTION:
Seeing how at that point Quirrell was inhabited by the "main" fragment of Voldemort's soul (and that fact was something 100% clear and obvious from "HP&SS" book), does the statement above mean that somehow there actually were *two fragments of it in Quirrell, one "main" and one "Horcrux"?* If not, then what's the "reveal" part?
harry-potter voldemort horcrux
add a comment |
From HP Wikia's "Horcrux" article:
J. K. Rowling revealed in Pottermore that Prof. Quirinus Quirrell served as a temporary Horcrux when Voldemort's soul possessed his body during Harry Potter's first year at Hogwarts. (source: Pottermore reveals Professor Quirrell's history & connection to Lord Voldemort)
QUESTION:
Seeing how at that point Quirrell was inhabited by the "main" fragment of Voldemort's soul (and that fact was something 100% clear and obvious from "HP&SS" book), does the statement above mean that somehow there actually were *two fragments of it in Quirrell, one "main" and one "Horcrux"?* If not, then what's the "reveal" part?
harry-potter voldemort horcrux
From HP Wikia's "Horcrux" article:
J. K. Rowling revealed in Pottermore that Prof. Quirinus Quirrell served as a temporary Horcrux when Voldemort's soul possessed his body during Harry Potter's first year at Hogwarts. (source: Pottermore reveals Professor Quirrell's history & connection to Lord Voldemort)
QUESTION:
Seeing how at that point Quirrell was inhabited by the "main" fragment of Voldemort's soul (and that fact was something 100% clear and obvious from "HP&SS" book), does the statement above mean that somehow there actually were *two fragments of it in Quirrell, one "main" and one "Horcrux"?* If not, then what's the "reveal" part?
harry-potter voldemort horcrux
harry-potter voldemort horcrux
edited Jan 15 '12 at 20:18
user56
asked Jan 6 '12 at 12:25
DVK-on-Ahch-ToDVK-on-Ahch-To
271k12312911855
271k12312911855
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
SCREENSHOT - Pottermore - Professor Quirrell Pottermore SPOILERS, obviously. NOTE: To best view this screenshot, you'll want to save it to your computer and view it there. The actual image is 1920x1000 px. Flickr limits the display size of pictures and it's hard to read easily just by viewing it on Flickr.
SPOILERS FOR POTTERMORE Anyhow, here's the reveal in question:
While Quirrell did not lose his soul, he became completely subjugated by Voldemort, who caused a frightful mutation of Quirrell's body: now Voldemort looked out of the back of Quirrell's head and directed his movements, even forcing him to attempt murder. Quirrell tried to put up feeble resistance on occasion, but Voldemort was far too strong for him.
Quirrell is, in effect, turned into a temporary Horcrux by Voldemort. He is greatly depleted by the physical strain of fighting the far stronger, evil soul inside him. Quirrell’s body manifests burns and blisters during his fight with Harry due to the protective power Harry's mother left in his skin when she died for him. When the body Voldemort and Quirrell are sharing is horribly burned by contact with Harry, the former flees just in time to save himself, leaving the damaged and enfeebled Quirrell to collapse and die.
I think your question is open to interpretation, actually. We know that during SS/PS, Voldemort was not corporeal, hence him needing Quirrell's body. I suppose I see Voldemort at that point as some kind of entity that retained Voldemort's essence and his soul. If one were to read the Pottermore text literally, then it's "soul," singular.
However, jumping forward to the later books, we learn that Voldemort rendered his soul very unstable by the sheer amount of Horcruxes he had created. He lost control of his soul (for lack of a better way of putting it) when he attempted to kill Harry, and that rogue piece of Voldemort's soul detached itself and transferred to Harry, making Harry a Horcrux.
Is it possible that what soul that remained in Voldemort was so unstable that perhaps it wasn't all in one piece, or perhaps it was cycling between states of being one unstable piece of soul and being fragmented? Maybe. It might be like taking apart an orange, segment by segment, and then trying to put the orange back together again. The orange may be back in its original shape, but its no longer strong like it was before it was segmented. It's not fully intact and if you leave it sitting there long enough, eventually it's going to somehow fall apart or shift or collapse because it no longer has the connections that held the segments together. No matter how many times you reshape the orange and put it back together, it's going to fall apart again. Sorry if this is a bad analogy.
I think that if Voldemort's soul was unstable enough that it could have been at times fractured, then yes it's possible that Quirrell's body housed more than one Horcrux piece of Voldemort's soul at some point.
2
'If one were to read the Pottermore text literally, then it's "soul," singular.' - uh... are you implying that Quirrell might have house ALL the united pieces of V's soul? I don't think that's the case. Or are you saying it house the remaining chunk BUT it's possible that remaining chunk splintered further INSIDE Quirrell?
– DVK-on-Ahch-To
Jan 6 '12 at 16:52
Sorry I was unclear. I meant the latter. Just an idea, though, a postulation. Waxing philosophical, I suppose :)
– Slytherincess
Jan 6 '12 at 16:56
@Slytherincess Voldermort was unstable (mentally as well as in soul) but I think he was going to make a 7th horcrux out of the murder of Harry, James or Lily anyway (Dumbledore mentions it) so his soul is prepared to break and so when the body was destroyed the soul split.
– Bellerophon
Feb 13 '16 at 21:42
add a comment |
No, I'm pretty sure she meant a "horcrux" as in a physical object holding a piece of his soul, in this case it just happened to be the main part.
But then, what's the "reveal" part regarding pottermore? In this reading, pretty much anyone with IQ more than Crabbe's would figure out Quirrell was a temporary Horcrux after reading HP7.
– DVK-on-Ahch-To
Jan 6 '12 at 16:49
2
@DVK I suspect it's more a "pointed out"/"confirmed" than "revealed", and just worded that way because it's a wiki. I can't access the source as I don't have (or particularly want) an account there to see, though.
– Kevin♦
Jan 6 '12 at 16:57
1
Crabbe's IQ aside, there was massive debate in HP fandom about whether Quirrell was actually a Horcrux or not, even after book seven was published. I'd call it more a confirmation than a reveal.
– Slytherincess
Jan 6 '12 at 16:58
@Kevin - if you do want to see the source, I put a link to a screenshot in my answer. Just an FYI. :)
– Slytherincess
Jan 6 '12 at 17:00
3
I guess I must be thicker than Crabbe, because I hadn't considered that Quirrell might have been a Horcrux - it makes sense, but it doesn't necessarily follow since it could be considered a straight possession.
– HorusKol
Jan 6 '12 at 21:42
|
show 1 more comment
The whole story with Quirrell happened long before Horcruxes were revealed. I would simply take that as clarification as to how Voldemort and Quirrell were merged.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "186"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f8606%2fdid-prof-quirrells-body-house-two-fragments-of-voldemorts-soul%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
SCREENSHOT - Pottermore - Professor Quirrell Pottermore SPOILERS, obviously. NOTE: To best view this screenshot, you'll want to save it to your computer and view it there. The actual image is 1920x1000 px. Flickr limits the display size of pictures and it's hard to read easily just by viewing it on Flickr.
SPOILERS FOR POTTERMORE Anyhow, here's the reveal in question:
While Quirrell did not lose his soul, he became completely subjugated by Voldemort, who caused a frightful mutation of Quirrell's body: now Voldemort looked out of the back of Quirrell's head and directed his movements, even forcing him to attempt murder. Quirrell tried to put up feeble resistance on occasion, but Voldemort was far too strong for him.
Quirrell is, in effect, turned into a temporary Horcrux by Voldemort. He is greatly depleted by the physical strain of fighting the far stronger, evil soul inside him. Quirrell’s body manifests burns and blisters during his fight with Harry due to the protective power Harry's mother left in his skin when she died for him. When the body Voldemort and Quirrell are sharing is horribly burned by contact with Harry, the former flees just in time to save himself, leaving the damaged and enfeebled Quirrell to collapse and die.
I think your question is open to interpretation, actually. We know that during SS/PS, Voldemort was not corporeal, hence him needing Quirrell's body. I suppose I see Voldemort at that point as some kind of entity that retained Voldemort's essence and his soul. If one were to read the Pottermore text literally, then it's "soul," singular.
However, jumping forward to the later books, we learn that Voldemort rendered his soul very unstable by the sheer amount of Horcruxes he had created. He lost control of his soul (for lack of a better way of putting it) when he attempted to kill Harry, and that rogue piece of Voldemort's soul detached itself and transferred to Harry, making Harry a Horcrux.
Is it possible that what soul that remained in Voldemort was so unstable that perhaps it wasn't all in one piece, or perhaps it was cycling between states of being one unstable piece of soul and being fragmented? Maybe. It might be like taking apart an orange, segment by segment, and then trying to put the orange back together again. The orange may be back in its original shape, but its no longer strong like it was before it was segmented. It's not fully intact and if you leave it sitting there long enough, eventually it's going to somehow fall apart or shift or collapse because it no longer has the connections that held the segments together. No matter how many times you reshape the orange and put it back together, it's going to fall apart again. Sorry if this is a bad analogy.
I think that if Voldemort's soul was unstable enough that it could have been at times fractured, then yes it's possible that Quirrell's body housed more than one Horcrux piece of Voldemort's soul at some point.
2
'If one were to read the Pottermore text literally, then it's "soul," singular.' - uh... are you implying that Quirrell might have house ALL the united pieces of V's soul? I don't think that's the case. Or are you saying it house the remaining chunk BUT it's possible that remaining chunk splintered further INSIDE Quirrell?
– DVK-on-Ahch-To
Jan 6 '12 at 16:52
Sorry I was unclear. I meant the latter. Just an idea, though, a postulation. Waxing philosophical, I suppose :)
– Slytherincess
Jan 6 '12 at 16:56
@Slytherincess Voldermort was unstable (mentally as well as in soul) but I think he was going to make a 7th horcrux out of the murder of Harry, James or Lily anyway (Dumbledore mentions it) so his soul is prepared to break and so when the body was destroyed the soul split.
– Bellerophon
Feb 13 '16 at 21:42
add a comment |
SCREENSHOT - Pottermore - Professor Quirrell Pottermore SPOILERS, obviously. NOTE: To best view this screenshot, you'll want to save it to your computer and view it there. The actual image is 1920x1000 px. Flickr limits the display size of pictures and it's hard to read easily just by viewing it on Flickr.
SPOILERS FOR POTTERMORE Anyhow, here's the reveal in question:
While Quirrell did not lose his soul, he became completely subjugated by Voldemort, who caused a frightful mutation of Quirrell's body: now Voldemort looked out of the back of Quirrell's head and directed his movements, even forcing him to attempt murder. Quirrell tried to put up feeble resistance on occasion, but Voldemort was far too strong for him.
Quirrell is, in effect, turned into a temporary Horcrux by Voldemort. He is greatly depleted by the physical strain of fighting the far stronger, evil soul inside him. Quirrell’s body manifests burns and blisters during his fight with Harry due to the protective power Harry's mother left in his skin when she died for him. When the body Voldemort and Quirrell are sharing is horribly burned by contact with Harry, the former flees just in time to save himself, leaving the damaged and enfeebled Quirrell to collapse and die.
I think your question is open to interpretation, actually. We know that during SS/PS, Voldemort was not corporeal, hence him needing Quirrell's body. I suppose I see Voldemort at that point as some kind of entity that retained Voldemort's essence and his soul. If one were to read the Pottermore text literally, then it's "soul," singular.
However, jumping forward to the later books, we learn that Voldemort rendered his soul very unstable by the sheer amount of Horcruxes he had created. He lost control of his soul (for lack of a better way of putting it) when he attempted to kill Harry, and that rogue piece of Voldemort's soul detached itself and transferred to Harry, making Harry a Horcrux.
Is it possible that what soul that remained in Voldemort was so unstable that perhaps it wasn't all in one piece, or perhaps it was cycling between states of being one unstable piece of soul and being fragmented? Maybe. It might be like taking apart an orange, segment by segment, and then trying to put the orange back together again. The orange may be back in its original shape, but its no longer strong like it was before it was segmented. It's not fully intact and if you leave it sitting there long enough, eventually it's going to somehow fall apart or shift or collapse because it no longer has the connections that held the segments together. No matter how many times you reshape the orange and put it back together, it's going to fall apart again. Sorry if this is a bad analogy.
I think that if Voldemort's soul was unstable enough that it could have been at times fractured, then yes it's possible that Quirrell's body housed more than one Horcrux piece of Voldemort's soul at some point.
2
'If one were to read the Pottermore text literally, then it's "soul," singular.' - uh... are you implying that Quirrell might have house ALL the united pieces of V's soul? I don't think that's the case. Or are you saying it house the remaining chunk BUT it's possible that remaining chunk splintered further INSIDE Quirrell?
– DVK-on-Ahch-To
Jan 6 '12 at 16:52
Sorry I was unclear. I meant the latter. Just an idea, though, a postulation. Waxing philosophical, I suppose :)
– Slytherincess
Jan 6 '12 at 16:56
@Slytherincess Voldermort was unstable (mentally as well as in soul) but I think he was going to make a 7th horcrux out of the murder of Harry, James or Lily anyway (Dumbledore mentions it) so his soul is prepared to break and so when the body was destroyed the soul split.
– Bellerophon
Feb 13 '16 at 21:42
add a comment |
SCREENSHOT - Pottermore - Professor Quirrell Pottermore SPOILERS, obviously. NOTE: To best view this screenshot, you'll want to save it to your computer and view it there. The actual image is 1920x1000 px. Flickr limits the display size of pictures and it's hard to read easily just by viewing it on Flickr.
SPOILERS FOR POTTERMORE Anyhow, here's the reveal in question:
While Quirrell did not lose his soul, he became completely subjugated by Voldemort, who caused a frightful mutation of Quirrell's body: now Voldemort looked out of the back of Quirrell's head and directed his movements, even forcing him to attempt murder. Quirrell tried to put up feeble resistance on occasion, but Voldemort was far too strong for him.
Quirrell is, in effect, turned into a temporary Horcrux by Voldemort. He is greatly depleted by the physical strain of fighting the far stronger, evil soul inside him. Quirrell’s body manifests burns and blisters during his fight with Harry due to the protective power Harry's mother left in his skin when she died for him. When the body Voldemort and Quirrell are sharing is horribly burned by contact with Harry, the former flees just in time to save himself, leaving the damaged and enfeebled Quirrell to collapse and die.
I think your question is open to interpretation, actually. We know that during SS/PS, Voldemort was not corporeal, hence him needing Quirrell's body. I suppose I see Voldemort at that point as some kind of entity that retained Voldemort's essence and his soul. If one were to read the Pottermore text literally, then it's "soul," singular.
However, jumping forward to the later books, we learn that Voldemort rendered his soul very unstable by the sheer amount of Horcruxes he had created. He lost control of his soul (for lack of a better way of putting it) when he attempted to kill Harry, and that rogue piece of Voldemort's soul detached itself and transferred to Harry, making Harry a Horcrux.
Is it possible that what soul that remained in Voldemort was so unstable that perhaps it wasn't all in one piece, or perhaps it was cycling between states of being one unstable piece of soul and being fragmented? Maybe. It might be like taking apart an orange, segment by segment, and then trying to put the orange back together again. The orange may be back in its original shape, but its no longer strong like it was before it was segmented. It's not fully intact and if you leave it sitting there long enough, eventually it's going to somehow fall apart or shift or collapse because it no longer has the connections that held the segments together. No matter how many times you reshape the orange and put it back together, it's going to fall apart again. Sorry if this is a bad analogy.
I think that if Voldemort's soul was unstable enough that it could have been at times fractured, then yes it's possible that Quirrell's body housed more than one Horcrux piece of Voldemort's soul at some point.
SCREENSHOT - Pottermore - Professor Quirrell Pottermore SPOILERS, obviously. NOTE: To best view this screenshot, you'll want to save it to your computer and view it there. The actual image is 1920x1000 px. Flickr limits the display size of pictures and it's hard to read easily just by viewing it on Flickr.
SPOILERS FOR POTTERMORE Anyhow, here's the reveal in question:
While Quirrell did not lose his soul, he became completely subjugated by Voldemort, who caused a frightful mutation of Quirrell's body: now Voldemort looked out of the back of Quirrell's head and directed his movements, even forcing him to attempt murder. Quirrell tried to put up feeble resistance on occasion, but Voldemort was far too strong for him.
Quirrell is, in effect, turned into a temporary Horcrux by Voldemort. He is greatly depleted by the physical strain of fighting the far stronger, evil soul inside him. Quirrell’s body manifests burns and blisters during his fight with Harry due to the protective power Harry's mother left in his skin when she died for him. When the body Voldemort and Quirrell are sharing is horribly burned by contact with Harry, the former flees just in time to save himself, leaving the damaged and enfeebled Quirrell to collapse and die.
I think your question is open to interpretation, actually. We know that during SS/PS, Voldemort was not corporeal, hence him needing Quirrell's body. I suppose I see Voldemort at that point as some kind of entity that retained Voldemort's essence and his soul. If one were to read the Pottermore text literally, then it's "soul," singular.
However, jumping forward to the later books, we learn that Voldemort rendered his soul very unstable by the sheer amount of Horcruxes he had created. He lost control of his soul (for lack of a better way of putting it) when he attempted to kill Harry, and that rogue piece of Voldemort's soul detached itself and transferred to Harry, making Harry a Horcrux.
Is it possible that what soul that remained in Voldemort was so unstable that perhaps it wasn't all in one piece, or perhaps it was cycling between states of being one unstable piece of soul and being fragmented? Maybe. It might be like taking apart an orange, segment by segment, and then trying to put the orange back together again. The orange may be back in its original shape, but its no longer strong like it was before it was segmented. It's not fully intact and if you leave it sitting there long enough, eventually it's going to somehow fall apart or shift or collapse because it no longer has the connections that held the segments together. No matter how many times you reshape the orange and put it back together, it's going to fall apart again. Sorry if this is a bad analogy.
I think that if Voldemort's soul was unstable enough that it could have been at times fractured, then yes it's possible that Quirrell's body housed more than one Horcrux piece of Voldemort's soul at some point.
edited 20 mins ago
Stormblessed
1,207423
1,207423
answered Jan 6 '12 at 14:09
SlytherincessSlytherincess
119k105614856
119k105614856
2
'If one were to read the Pottermore text literally, then it's "soul," singular.' - uh... are you implying that Quirrell might have house ALL the united pieces of V's soul? I don't think that's the case. Or are you saying it house the remaining chunk BUT it's possible that remaining chunk splintered further INSIDE Quirrell?
– DVK-on-Ahch-To
Jan 6 '12 at 16:52
Sorry I was unclear. I meant the latter. Just an idea, though, a postulation. Waxing philosophical, I suppose :)
– Slytherincess
Jan 6 '12 at 16:56
@Slytherincess Voldermort was unstable (mentally as well as in soul) but I think he was going to make a 7th horcrux out of the murder of Harry, James or Lily anyway (Dumbledore mentions it) so his soul is prepared to break and so when the body was destroyed the soul split.
– Bellerophon
Feb 13 '16 at 21:42
add a comment |
2
'If one were to read the Pottermore text literally, then it's "soul," singular.' - uh... are you implying that Quirrell might have house ALL the united pieces of V's soul? I don't think that's the case. Or are you saying it house the remaining chunk BUT it's possible that remaining chunk splintered further INSIDE Quirrell?
– DVK-on-Ahch-To
Jan 6 '12 at 16:52
Sorry I was unclear. I meant the latter. Just an idea, though, a postulation. Waxing philosophical, I suppose :)
– Slytherincess
Jan 6 '12 at 16:56
@Slytherincess Voldermort was unstable (mentally as well as in soul) but I think he was going to make a 7th horcrux out of the murder of Harry, James or Lily anyway (Dumbledore mentions it) so his soul is prepared to break and so when the body was destroyed the soul split.
– Bellerophon
Feb 13 '16 at 21:42
2
2
'If one were to read the Pottermore text literally, then it's "soul," singular.' - uh... are you implying that Quirrell might have house ALL the united pieces of V's soul? I don't think that's the case. Or are you saying it house the remaining chunk BUT it's possible that remaining chunk splintered further INSIDE Quirrell?
– DVK-on-Ahch-To
Jan 6 '12 at 16:52
'If one were to read the Pottermore text literally, then it's "soul," singular.' - uh... are you implying that Quirrell might have house ALL the united pieces of V's soul? I don't think that's the case. Or are you saying it house the remaining chunk BUT it's possible that remaining chunk splintered further INSIDE Quirrell?
– DVK-on-Ahch-To
Jan 6 '12 at 16:52
Sorry I was unclear. I meant the latter. Just an idea, though, a postulation. Waxing philosophical, I suppose :)
– Slytherincess
Jan 6 '12 at 16:56
Sorry I was unclear. I meant the latter. Just an idea, though, a postulation. Waxing philosophical, I suppose :)
– Slytherincess
Jan 6 '12 at 16:56
@Slytherincess Voldermort was unstable (mentally as well as in soul) but I think he was going to make a 7th horcrux out of the murder of Harry, James or Lily anyway (Dumbledore mentions it) so his soul is prepared to break and so when the body was destroyed the soul split.
– Bellerophon
Feb 13 '16 at 21:42
@Slytherincess Voldermort was unstable (mentally as well as in soul) but I think he was going to make a 7th horcrux out of the murder of Harry, James or Lily anyway (Dumbledore mentions it) so his soul is prepared to break and so when the body was destroyed the soul split.
– Bellerophon
Feb 13 '16 at 21:42
add a comment |
No, I'm pretty sure she meant a "horcrux" as in a physical object holding a piece of his soul, in this case it just happened to be the main part.
But then, what's the "reveal" part regarding pottermore? In this reading, pretty much anyone with IQ more than Crabbe's would figure out Quirrell was a temporary Horcrux after reading HP7.
– DVK-on-Ahch-To
Jan 6 '12 at 16:49
2
@DVK I suspect it's more a "pointed out"/"confirmed" than "revealed", and just worded that way because it's a wiki. I can't access the source as I don't have (or particularly want) an account there to see, though.
– Kevin♦
Jan 6 '12 at 16:57
1
Crabbe's IQ aside, there was massive debate in HP fandom about whether Quirrell was actually a Horcrux or not, even after book seven was published. I'd call it more a confirmation than a reveal.
– Slytherincess
Jan 6 '12 at 16:58
@Kevin - if you do want to see the source, I put a link to a screenshot in my answer. Just an FYI. :)
– Slytherincess
Jan 6 '12 at 17:00
3
I guess I must be thicker than Crabbe, because I hadn't considered that Quirrell might have been a Horcrux - it makes sense, but it doesn't necessarily follow since it could be considered a straight possession.
– HorusKol
Jan 6 '12 at 21:42
|
show 1 more comment
No, I'm pretty sure she meant a "horcrux" as in a physical object holding a piece of his soul, in this case it just happened to be the main part.
But then, what's the "reveal" part regarding pottermore? In this reading, pretty much anyone with IQ more than Crabbe's would figure out Quirrell was a temporary Horcrux after reading HP7.
– DVK-on-Ahch-To
Jan 6 '12 at 16:49
2
@DVK I suspect it's more a "pointed out"/"confirmed" than "revealed", and just worded that way because it's a wiki. I can't access the source as I don't have (or particularly want) an account there to see, though.
– Kevin♦
Jan 6 '12 at 16:57
1
Crabbe's IQ aside, there was massive debate in HP fandom about whether Quirrell was actually a Horcrux or not, even after book seven was published. I'd call it more a confirmation than a reveal.
– Slytherincess
Jan 6 '12 at 16:58
@Kevin - if you do want to see the source, I put a link to a screenshot in my answer. Just an FYI. :)
– Slytherincess
Jan 6 '12 at 17:00
3
I guess I must be thicker than Crabbe, because I hadn't considered that Quirrell might have been a Horcrux - it makes sense, but it doesn't necessarily follow since it could be considered a straight possession.
– HorusKol
Jan 6 '12 at 21:42
|
show 1 more comment
No, I'm pretty sure she meant a "horcrux" as in a physical object holding a piece of his soul, in this case it just happened to be the main part.
No, I'm pretty sure she meant a "horcrux" as in a physical object holding a piece of his soul, in this case it just happened to be the main part.
answered Jan 6 '12 at 16:19
Kevin♦Kevin
26.4k10110156
26.4k10110156
But then, what's the "reveal" part regarding pottermore? In this reading, pretty much anyone with IQ more than Crabbe's would figure out Quirrell was a temporary Horcrux after reading HP7.
– DVK-on-Ahch-To
Jan 6 '12 at 16:49
2
@DVK I suspect it's more a "pointed out"/"confirmed" than "revealed", and just worded that way because it's a wiki. I can't access the source as I don't have (or particularly want) an account there to see, though.
– Kevin♦
Jan 6 '12 at 16:57
1
Crabbe's IQ aside, there was massive debate in HP fandom about whether Quirrell was actually a Horcrux or not, even after book seven was published. I'd call it more a confirmation than a reveal.
– Slytherincess
Jan 6 '12 at 16:58
@Kevin - if you do want to see the source, I put a link to a screenshot in my answer. Just an FYI. :)
– Slytherincess
Jan 6 '12 at 17:00
3
I guess I must be thicker than Crabbe, because I hadn't considered that Quirrell might have been a Horcrux - it makes sense, but it doesn't necessarily follow since it could be considered a straight possession.
– HorusKol
Jan 6 '12 at 21:42
|
show 1 more comment
But then, what's the "reveal" part regarding pottermore? In this reading, pretty much anyone with IQ more than Crabbe's would figure out Quirrell was a temporary Horcrux after reading HP7.
– DVK-on-Ahch-To
Jan 6 '12 at 16:49
2
@DVK I suspect it's more a "pointed out"/"confirmed" than "revealed", and just worded that way because it's a wiki. I can't access the source as I don't have (or particularly want) an account there to see, though.
– Kevin♦
Jan 6 '12 at 16:57
1
Crabbe's IQ aside, there was massive debate in HP fandom about whether Quirrell was actually a Horcrux or not, even after book seven was published. I'd call it more a confirmation than a reveal.
– Slytherincess
Jan 6 '12 at 16:58
@Kevin - if you do want to see the source, I put a link to a screenshot in my answer. Just an FYI. :)
– Slytherincess
Jan 6 '12 at 17:00
3
I guess I must be thicker than Crabbe, because I hadn't considered that Quirrell might have been a Horcrux - it makes sense, but it doesn't necessarily follow since it could be considered a straight possession.
– HorusKol
Jan 6 '12 at 21:42
But then, what's the "reveal" part regarding pottermore? In this reading, pretty much anyone with IQ more than Crabbe's would figure out Quirrell was a temporary Horcrux after reading HP7.
– DVK-on-Ahch-To
Jan 6 '12 at 16:49
But then, what's the "reveal" part regarding pottermore? In this reading, pretty much anyone with IQ more than Crabbe's would figure out Quirrell was a temporary Horcrux after reading HP7.
– DVK-on-Ahch-To
Jan 6 '12 at 16:49
2
2
@DVK I suspect it's more a "pointed out"/"confirmed" than "revealed", and just worded that way because it's a wiki. I can't access the source as I don't have (or particularly want) an account there to see, though.
– Kevin♦
Jan 6 '12 at 16:57
@DVK I suspect it's more a "pointed out"/"confirmed" than "revealed", and just worded that way because it's a wiki. I can't access the source as I don't have (or particularly want) an account there to see, though.
– Kevin♦
Jan 6 '12 at 16:57
1
1
Crabbe's IQ aside, there was massive debate in HP fandom about whether Quirrell was actually a Horcrux or not, even after book seven was published. I'd call it more a confirmation than a reveal.
– Slytherincess
Jan 6 '12 at 16:58
Crabbe's IQ aside, there was massive debate in HP fandom about whether Quirrell was actually a Horcrux or not, even after book seven was published. I'd call it more a confirmation than a reveal.
– Slytherincess
Jan 6 '12 at 16:58
@Kevin - if you do want to see the source, I put a link to a screenshot in my answer. Just an FYI. :)
– Slytherincess
Jan 6 '12 at 17:00
@Kevin - if you do want to see the source, I put a link to a screenshot in my answer. Just an FYI. :)
– Slytherincess
Jan 6 '12 at 17:00
3
3
I guess I must be thicker than Crabbe, because I hadn't considered that Quirrell might have been a Horcrux - it makes sense, but it doesn't necessarily follow since it could be considered a straight possession.
– HorusKol
Jan 6 '12 at 21:42
I guess I must be thicker than Crabbe, because I hadn't considered that Quirrell might have been a Horcrux - it makes sense, but it doesn't necessarily follow since it could be considered a straight possession.
– HorusKol
Jan 6 '12 at 21:42
|
show 1 more comment
The whole story with Quirrell happened long before Horcruxes were revealed. I would simply take that as clarification as to how Voldemort and Quirrell were merged.
add a comment |
The whole story with Quirrell happened long before Horcruxes were revealed. I would simply take that as clarification as to how Voldemort and Quirrell were merged.
add a comment |
The whole story with Quirrell happened long before Horcruxes were revealed. I would simply take that as clarification as to how Voldemort and Quirrell were merged.
The whole story with Quirrell happened long before Horcruxes were revealed. I would simply take that as clarification as to how Voldemort and Quirrell were merged.
answered Jan 6 '12 at 13:06
IzkataIzkata
53.5k10169270
53.5k10169270
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f8606%2fdid-prof-quirrells-body-house-two-fragments-of-voldemorts-soul%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown