Tenured professor’s husband convicted of a drugs-trafficking felony – are there any career implications?...
At the university I work at in the US, a tenured professor’s husband has been convicted of drugs trafficking. Would there be any likely (career) implications for the professor?
Obviously, their personal life will be affected, but is it likely to have implications otherwise?
united-states professors drugs
put on hold as off-topic by corey979, Dmitry Savostyanov, Bryan Krause, user3209815, Dmitry Grigoryev yesterday
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is not within the scope of this site as defined in the help center. Our scope particularly excludes the content of research, education outside of a university setting, and undergraduate admissions, life, and culture." – corey979, Dmitry Savostyanov, Bryan Krause, user3209815, Dmitry Grigoryev
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
|
show 4 more comments
At the university I work at in the US, a tenured professor’s husband has been convicted of drugs trafficking. Would there be any likely (career) implications for the professor?
Obviously, their personal life will be affected, but is it likely to have implications otherwise?
united-states professors drugs
put on hold as off-topic by corey979, Dmitry Savostyanov, Bryan Krause, user3209815, Dmitry Grigoryev yesterday
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is not within the scope of this site as defined in the help center. Our scope particularly excludes the content of research, education outside of a university setting, and undergraduate admissions, life, and culture." – corey979, Dmitry Savostyanov, Bryan Krause, user3209815, Dmitry Grigoryev
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
9
What does this have to do with academia? Is this boat programming? meta.stackexchange.com/questions/14470/…
– Anonymous Physicist
yesterday
3
I'm not sure I understand the boat programming reference, but the question is definitely about academia. The question is asking whether there would be career consequences for a professor whose husband had been convicted of a felony. If the Professor herself had been convicted, I think the answer would be clear. In this case, the connection between the felony and the professor is less direct. However, the nature of the crime (compared to say, assaulting someone) makes the link a little stronger than it might otherwise be
– user1778351
yesterday
1
you are innocent until proven guilty, so a "somewhat stronger link to a felony" still equals innocent.
– Maarten Buis
yesterday
5
I'll note that drug laws in the US are insane. People get charged with "drug trafficking felonies" when they are nothing more than addicts sharing drugs with friends. The jails/prisons are full of such people.
– Buffy
yesterday
2
Your ‘assumption’ is a baseless accusation wrapped up to look pretty.
– Jon Custer
yesterday
|
show 4 more comments
At the university I work at in the US, a tenured professor’s husband has been convicted of drugs trafficking. Would there be any likely (career) implications for the professor?
Obviously, their personal life will be affected, but is it likely to have implications otherwise?
united-states professors drugs
At the university I work at in the US, a tenured professor’s husband has been convicted of drugs trafficking. Would there be any likely (career) implications for the professor?
Obviously, their personal life will be affected, but is it likely to have implications otherwise?
united-states professors drugs
united-states professors drugs
edited yesterday
user1778351
asked yesterday
user1778351user1778351
12529
12529
put on hold as off-topic by corey979, Dmitry Savostyanov, Bryan Krause, user3209815, Dmitry Grigoryev yesterday
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is not within the scope of this site as defined in the help center. Our scope particularly excludes the content of research, education outside of a university setting, and undergraduate admissions, life, and culture." – corey979, Dmitry Savostyanov, Bryan Krause, user3209815, Dmitry Grigoryev
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
put on hold as off-topic by corey979, Dmitry Savostyanov, Bryan Krause, user3209815, Dmitry Grigoryev yesterday
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is not within the scope of this site as defined in the help center. Our scope particularly excludes the content of research, education outside of a university setting, and undergraduate admissions, life, and culture." – corey979, Dmitry Savostyanov, Bryan Krause, user3209815, Dmitry Grigoryev
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
9
What does this have to do with academia? Is this boat programming? meta.stackexchange.com/questions/14470/…
– Anonymous Physicist
yesterday
3
I'm not sure I understand the boat programming reference, but the question is definitely about academia. The question is asking whether there would be career consequences for a professor whose husband had been convicted of a felony. If the Professor herself had been convicted, I think the answer would be clear. In this case, the connection between the felony and the professor is less direct. However, the nature of the crime (compared to say, assaulting someone) makes the link a little stronger than it might otherwise be
– user1778351
yesterday
1
you are innocent until proven guilty, so a "somewhat stronger link to a felony" still equals innocent.
– Maarten Buis
yesterday
5
I'll note that drug laws in the US are insane. People get charged with "drug trafficking felonies" when they are nothing more than addicts sharing drugs with friends. The jails/prisons are full of such people.
– Buffy
yesterday
2
Your ‘assumption’ is a baseless accusation wrapped up to look pretty.
– Jon Custer
yesterday
|
show 4 more comments
9
What does this have to do with academia? Is this boat programming? meta.stackexchange.com/questions/14470/…
– Anonymous Physicist
yesterday
3
I'm not sure I understand the boat programming reference, but the question is definitely about academia. The question is asking whether there would be career consequences for a professor whose husband had been convicted of a felony. If the Professor herself had been convicted, I think the answer would be clear. In this case, the connection between the felony and the professor is less direct. However, the nature of the crime (compared to say, assaulting someone) makes the link a little stronger than it might otherwise be
– user1778351
yesterday
1
you are innocent until proven guilty, so a "somewhat stronger link to a felony" still equals innocent.
– Maarten Buis
yesterday
5
I'll note that drug laws in the US are insane. People get charged with "drug trafficking felonies" when they are nothing more than addicts sharing drugs with friends. The jails/prisons are full of such people.
– Buffy
yesterday
2
Your ‘assumption’ is a baseless accusation wrapped up to look pretty.
– Jon Custer
yesterday
9
9
What does this have to do with academia? Is this boat programming? meta.stackexchange.com/questions/14470/…
– Anonymous Physicist
yesterday
What does this have to do with academia? Is this boat programming? meta.stackexchange.com/questions/14470/…
– Anonymous Physicist
yesterday
3
3
I'm not sure I understand the boat programming reference, but the question is definitely about academia. The question is asking whether there would be career consequences for a professor whose husband had been convicted of a felony. If the Professor herself had been convicted, I think the answer would be clear. In this case, the connection between the felony and the professor is less direct. However, the nature of the crime (compared to say, assaulting someone) makes the link a little stronger than it might otherwise be
– user1778351
yesterday
I'm not sure I understand the boat programming reference, but the question is definitely about academia. The question is asking whether there would be career consequences for a professor whose husband had been convicted of a felony. If the Professor herself had been convicted, I think the answer would be clear. In this case, the connection between the felony and the professor is less direct. However, the nature of the crime (compared to say, assaulting someone) makes the link a little stronger than it might otherwise be
– user1778351
yesterday
1
1
you are innocent until proven guilty, so a "somewhat stronger link to a felony" still equals innocent.
– Maarten Buis
yesterday
you are innocent until proven guilty, so a "somewhat stronger link to a felony" still equals innocent.
– Maarten Buis
yesterday
5
5
I'll note that drug laws in the US are insane. People get charged with "drug trafficking felonies" when they are nothing more than addicts sharing drugs with friends. The jails/prisons are full of such people.
– Buffy
yesterday
I'll note that drug laws in the US are insane. People get charged with "drug trafficking felonies" when they are nothing more than addicts sharing drugs with friends. The jails/prisons are full of such people.
– Buffy
yesterday
2
2
Your ‘assumption’ is a baseless accusation wrapped up to look pretty.
– Jon Custer
yesterday
Your ‘assumption’ is a baseless accusation wrapped up to look pretty.
– Jon Custer
yesterday
|
show 4 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
This is a question which can only the respective university can answer. (I assume in my answer that the police has not proven involvement of the professor in the drug thing.)
Ideally (and most likely also by law, but you do not specify your location), husband and wife (or husband and husband, wife and wife) are treated as two separate people -- if one does a crime, it does not mean that both are involved. That the professor is not involved should also be the default assumption of the university unless the police proved otherwise.
Of course, people often talk and make decisions which are not backed up by the law. It may be of course that there are implications for the professor -- most likely, it's not explicitly said that they are connected to the drug thing.
For implications outside of the university, the same holds. Ideally, nobody treats the prof differently, but people sometimes do.
New contributor
If you need security clearance of some sort (think nuclear physics) spouses might count though.
– Borgh
17 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
This is a question which can only the respective university can answer. (I assume in my answer that the police has not proven involvement of the professor in the drug thing.)
Ideally (and most likely also by law, but you do not specify your location), husband and wife (or husband and husband, wife and wife) are treated as two separate people -- if one does a crime, it does not mean that both are involved. That the professor is not involved should also be the default assumption of the university unless the police proved otherwise.
Of course, people often talk and make decisions which are not backed up by the law. It may be of course that there are implications for the professor -- most likely, it's not explicitly said that they are connected to the drug thing.
For implications outside of the university, the same holds. Ideally, nobody treats the prof differently, but people sometimes do.
New contributor
If you need security clearance of some sort (think nuclear physics) spouses might count though.
– Borgh
17 hours ago
add a comment |
This is a question which can only the respective university can answer. (I assume in my answer that the police has not proven involvement of the professor in the drug thing.)
Ideally (and most likely also by law, but you do not specify your location), husband and wife (or husband and husband, wife and wife) are treated as two separate people -- if one does a crime, it does not mean that both are involved. That the professor is not involved should also be the default assumption of the university unless the police proved otherwise.
Of course, people often talk and make decisions which are not backed up by the law. It may be of course that there are implications for the professor -- most likely, it's not explicitly said that they are connected to the drug thing.
For implications outside of the university, the same holds. Ideally, nobody treats the prof differently, but people sometimes do.
New contributor
If you need security clearance of some sort (think nuclear physics) spouses might count though.
– Borgh
17 hours ago
add a comment |
This is a question which can only the respective university can answer. (I assume in my answer that the police has not proven involvement of the professor in the drug thing.)
Ideally (and most likely also by law, but you do not specify your location), husband and wife (or husband and husband, wife and wife) are treated as two separate people -- if one does a crime, it does not mean that both are involved. That the professor is not involved should also be the default assumption of the university unless the police proved otherwise.
Of course, people often talk and make decisions which are not backed up by the law. It may be of course that there are implications for the professor -- most likely, it's not explicitly said that they are connected to the drug thing.
For implications outside of the university, the same holds. Ideally, nobody treats the prof differently, but people sometimes do.
New contributor
This is a question which can only the respective university can answer. (I assume in my answer that the police has not proven involvement of the professor in the drug thing.)
Ideally (and most likely also by law, but you do not specify your location), husband and wife (or husband and husband, wife and wife) are treated as two separate people -- if one does a crime, it does not mean that both are involved. That the professor is not involved should also be the default assumption of the university unless the police proved otherwise.
Of course, people often talk and make decisions which are not backed up by the law. It may be of course that there are implications for the professor -- most likely, it's not explicitly said that they are connected to the drug thing.
For implications outside of the university, the same holds. Ideally, nobody treats the prof differently, but people sometimes do.
New contributor
New contributor
answered yesterday
HollaHolla
712
712
New contributor
New contributor
If you need security clearance of some sort (think nuclear physics) spouses might count though.
– Borgh
17 hours ago
add a comment |
If you need security clearance of some sort (think nuclear physics) spouses might count though.
– Borgh
17 hours ago
If you need security clearance of some sort (think nuclear physics) spouses might count though.
– Borgh
17 hours ago
If you need security clearance of some sort (think nuclear physics) spouses might count though.
– Borgh
17 hours ago
add a comment |
9
What does this have to do with academia? Is this boat programming? meta.stackexchange.com/questions/14470/…
– Anonymous Physicist
yesterday
3
I'm not sure I understand the boat programming reference, but the question is definitely about academia. The question is asking whether there would be career consequences for a professor whose husband had been convicted of a felony. If the Professor herself had been convicted, I think the answer would be clear. In this case, the connection between the felony and the professor is less direct. However, the nature of the crime (compared to say, assaulting someone) makes the link a little stronger than it might otherwise be
– user1778351
yesterday
1
you are innocent until proven guilty, so a "somewhat stronger link to a felony" still equals innocent.
– Maarten Buis
yesterday
5
I'll note that drug laws in the US are insane. People get charged with "drug trafficking felonies" when they are nothing more than addicts sharing drugs with friends. The jails/prisons are full of such people.
– Buffy
yesterday
2
Your ‘assumption’ is a baseless accusation wrapped up to look pretty.
– Jon Custer
yesterday