Problem of parity - Can we draw a closed path made up of 20 line segments…
$begingroup$
Can we draw a closed path made up of 20 line segments, each of which intersects exactly one of the other segments?
recreational-mathematics parity
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Can we draw a closed path made up of 20 line segments, each of which intersects exactly one of the other segments?
recreational-mathematics parity
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Can we draw a closed path made up of 20 line segments, each of which intersects exactly one of the other segments?
recreational-mathematics parity
New contributor
$endgroup$
Can we draw a closed path made up of 20 line segments, each of which intersects exactly one of the other segments?
recreational-mathematics parity
recreational-mathematics parity
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 7 hours ago
Luiz FariasLuiz Farias
241
241
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
David G. Stork's example with $18$ points and edges can easily be changed into an example with $10$ points and edges based on a pentagon inside another pentagon with alternating links. So take two of those $10$ solutions, one inside the other, and then join them appropriately to get something like this with $20$ points and edges.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Interesting that it has to "reverse direction"; I wonder if there's a winding-number argument to show something like this must be true...but I'm too groggy to work one out.
$endgroup$
– John Hughes
6 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Bravo! (+1).... the key seems to be reversing chirality.
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
It would be similarly possible to combine $6$ and $14$ solutions, and to have the sub-solutions next to each other rather than one inside the other
$endgroup$
– Henry
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Henry: Can you write code (Mathematica?) to generate a solution given $n = 2k$? That would be incredible. (I wrote code for my $n = 18$ "solution.")
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@DavidG.Stork - I am afraid no as I do not do Mathematica. But the answer should be realtively simple: if $k$ is odd (and at least $3$) use your solution, while if $k$ is even (and at least $6$) then split it into two odd numbers (each at least $3$) and use your solution on each, finally adjusting to join them. This means I do not have a solution for $k=4$, i.e. for $n=8$
$endgroup$
– Henry
5 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
(I assume there can be no crossings at vertices or corners.)
Here is one solution for $18$ (and @Henry, below, generalizes to $20$):
Since each segment is crossed by exactly one other segment, we can think of the problem as having 10 Xs that have to be linked without crossing.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Indeed - you seem to use $9$ being odd, though $10$ is not
$endgroup$
– Henry
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can certainly do it if your drawing is on a torus: draw a decagon that goes "through the hole"; then draw a zigzag (like the one in your picture) that crosses each edge of the decagon once. The two ends of the zigzag will end up on opposite "sides" of the original decagon, but can be joined "around the back". By converting the situation to one involving a "square donut" (akin to this one) you can probably do this all with straight lines, although that may be easier if the cross-section is a pentagon rather than a square...
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I wonder if your "square donut" will force kinks in lines, thereby breaking the conditions of the problem. Possible... but not certain...
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
You may well be right. Could be that there's a Z/2Z obstruction hiding in here somewhere.
$endgroup$
– John Hughes
6 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Luiz Farias is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3177522%2fproblem-of-parity-can-we-draw-a-closed-path-made-up-of-20-line-segments%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
David G. Stork's example with $18$ points and edges can easily be changed into an example with $10$ points and edges based on a pentagon inside another pentagon with alternating links. So take two of those $10$ solutions, one inside the other, and then join them appropriately to get something like this with $20$ points and edges.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Interesting that it has to "reverse direction"; I wonder if there's a winding-number argument to show something like this must be true...but I'm too groggy to work one out.
$endgroup$
– John Hughes
6 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Bravo! (+1).... the key seems to be reversing chirality.
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
It would be similarly possible to combine $6$ and $14$ solutions, and to have the sub-solutions next to each other rather than one inside the other
$endgroup$
– Henry
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Henry: Can you write code (Mathematica?) to generate a solution given $n = 2k$? That would be incredible. (I wrote code for my $n = 18$ "solution.")
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@DavidG.Stork - I am afraid no as I do not do Mathematica. But the answer should be realtively simple: if $k$ is odd (and at least $3$) use your solution, while if $k$ is even (and at least $6$) then split it into two odd numbers (each at least $3$) and use your solution on each, finally adjusting to join them. This means I do not have a solution for $k=4$, i.e. for $n=8$
$endgroup$
– Henry
5 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
David G. Stork's example with $18$ points and edges can easily be changed into an example with $10$ points and edges based on a pentagon inside another pentagon with alternating links. So take two of those $10$ solutions, one inside the other, and then join them appropriately to get something like this with $20$ points and edges.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Interesting that it has to "reverse direction"; I wonder if there's a winding-number argument to show something like this must be true...but I'm too groggy to work one out.
$endgroup$
– John Hughes
6 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Bravo! (+1).... the key seems to be reversing chirality.
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
It would be similarly possible to combine $6$ and $14$ solutions, and to have the sub-solutions next to each other rather than one inside the other
$endgroup$
– Henry
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Henry: Can you write code (Mathematica?) to generate a solution given $n = 2k$? That would be incredible. (I wrote code for my $n = 18$ "solution.")
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@DavidG.Stork - I am afraid no as I do not do Mathematica. But the answer should be realtively simple: if $k$ is odd (and at least $3$) use your solution, while if $k$ is even (and at least $6$) then split it into two odd numbers (each at least $3$) and use your solution on each, finally adjusting to join them. This means I do not have a solution for $k=4$, i.e. for $n=8$
$endgroup$
– Henry
5 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
David G. Stork's example with $18$ points and edges can easily be changed into an example with $10$ points and edges based on a pentagon inside another pentagon with alternating links. So take two of those $10$ solutions, one inside the other, and then join them appropriately to get something like this with $20$ points and edges.
$endgroup$
David G. Stork's example with $18$ points and edges can easily be changed into an example with $10$ points and edges based on a pentagon inside another pentagon with alternating links. So take two of those $10$ solutions, one inside the other, and then join them appropriately to get something like this with $20$ points and edges.
edited 6 hours ago
answered 6 hours ago
HenryHenry
101k482170
101k482170
1
$begingroup$
Interesting that it has to "reverse direction"; I wonder if there's a winding-number argument to show something like this must be true...but I'm too groggy to work one out.
$endgroup$
– John Hughes
6 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Bravo! (+1).... the key seems to be reversing chirality.
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
It would be similarly possible to combine $6$ and $14$ solutions, and to have the sub-solutions next to each other rather than one inside the other
$endgroup$
– Henry
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Henry: Can you write code (Mathematica?) to generate a solution given $n = 2k$? That would be incredible. (I wrote code for my $n = 18$ "solution.")
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@DavidG.Stork - I am afraid no as I do not do Mathematica. But the answer should be realtively simple: if $k$ is odd (and at least $3$) use your solution, while if $k$ is even (and at least $6$) then split it into two odd numbers (each at least $3$) and use your solution on each, finally adjusting to join them. This means I do not have a solution for $k=4$, i.e. for $n=8$
$endgroup$
– Henry
5 hours ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Interesting that it has to "reverse direction"; I wonder if there's a winding-number argument to show something like this must be true...but I'm too groggy to work one out.
$endgroup$
– John Hughes
6 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Bravo! (+1).... the key seems to be reversing chirality.
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
It would be similarly possible to combine $6$ and $14$ solutions, and to have the sub-solutions next to each other rather than one inside the other
$endgroup$
– Henry
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Henry: Can you write code (Mathematica?) to generate a solution given $n = 2k$? That would be incredible. (I wrote code for my $n = 18$ "solution.")
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@DavidG.Stork - I am afraid no as I do not do Mathematica. But the answer should be realtively simple: if $k$ is odd (and at least $3$) use your solution, while if $k$ is even (and at least $6$) then split it into two odd numbers (each at least $3$) and use your solution on each, finally adjusting to join them. This means I do not have a solution for $k=4$, i.e. for $n=8$
$endgroup$
– Henry
5 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Interesting that it has to "reverse direction"; I wonder if there's a winding-number argument to show something like this must be true...but I'm too groggy to work one out.
$endgroup$
– John Hughes
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
Interesting that it has to "reverse direction"; I wonder if there's a winding-number argument to show something like this must be true...but I'm too groggy to work one out.
$endgroup$
– John Hughes
6 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Bravo! (+1).... the key seems to be reversing chirality.
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
Bravo! (+1).... the key seems to be reversing chirality.
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
It would be similarly possible to combine $6$ and $14$ solutions, and to have the sub-solutions next to each other rather than one inside the other
$endgroup$
– Henry
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
It would be similarly possible to combine $6$ and $14$ solutions, and to have the sub-solutions next to each other rather than one inside the other
$endgroup$
– Henry
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Henry: Can you write code (Mathematica?) to generate a solution given $n = 2k$? That would be incredible. (I wrote code for my $n = 18$ "solution.")
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Henry: Can you write code (Mathematica?) to generate a solution given $n = 2k$? That would be incredible. (I wrote code for my $n = 18$ "solution.")
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@DavidG.Stork - I am afraid no as I do not do Mathematica. But the answer should be realtively simple: if $k$ is odd (and at least $3$) use your solution, while if $k$ is even (and at least $6$) then split it into two odd numbers (each at least $3$) and use your solution on each, finally adjusting to join them. This means I do not have a solution for $k=4$, i.e. for $n=8$
$endgroup$
– Henry
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@DavidG.Stork - I am afraid no as I do not do Mathematica. But the answer should be realtively simple: if $k$ is odd (and at least $3$) use your solution, while if $k$ is even (and at least $6$) then split it into two odd numbers (each at least $3$) and use your solution on each, finally adjusting to join them. This means I do not have a solution for $k=4$, i.e. for $n=8$
$endgroup$
– Henry
5 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
(I assume there can be no crossings at vertices or corners.)
Here is one solution for $18$ (and @Henry, below, generalizes to $20$):
Since each segment is crossed by exactly one other segment, we can think of the problem as having 10 Xs that have to be linked without crossing.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Indeed - you seem to use $9$ being odd, though $10$ is not
$endgroup$
– Henry
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
(I assume there can be no crossings at vertices or corners.)
Here is one solution for $18$ (and @Henry, below, generalizes to $20$):
Since each segment is crossed by exactly one other segment, we can think of the problem as having 10 Xs that have to be linked without crossing.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Indeed - you seem to use $9$ being odd, though $10$ is not
$endgroup$
– Henry
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
(I assume there can be no crossings at vertices or corners.)
Here is one solution for $18$ (and @Henry, below, generalizes to $20$):
Since each segment is crossed by exactly one other segment, we can think of the problem as having 10 Xs that have to be linked without crossing.
$endgroup$
(I assume there can be no crossings at vertices or corners.)
Here is one solution for $18$ (and @Henry, below, generalizes to $20$):
Since each segment is crossed by exactly one other segment, we can think of the problem as having 10 Xs that have to be linked without crossing.
edited 6 hours ago
answered 7 hours ago
David G. StorkDavid G. Stork
12k41735
12k41735
1
$begingroup$
Indeed - you seem to use $9$ being odd, though $10$ is not
$endgroup$
– Henry
7 hours ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Indeed - you seem to use $9$ being odd, though $10$ is not
$endgroup$
– Henry
7 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Indeed - you seem to use $9$ being odd, though $10$ is not
$endgroup$
– Henry
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Indeed - you seem to use $9$ being odd, though $10$ is not
$endgroup$
– Henry
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can certainly do it if your drawing is on a torus: draw a decagon that goes "through the hole"; then draw a zigzag (like the one in your picture) that crosses each edge of the decagon once. The two ends of the zigzag will end up on opposite "sides" of the original decagon, but can be joined "around the back". By converting the situation to one involving a "square donut" (akin to this one) you can probably do this all with straight lines, although that may be easier if the cross-section is a pentagon rather than a square...
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I wonder if your "square donut" will force kinks in lines, thereby breaking the conditions of the problem. Possible... but not certain...
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
You may well be right. Could be that there's a Z/2Z obstruction hiding in here somewhere.
$endgroup$
– John Hughes
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can certainly do it if your drawing is on a torus: draw a decagon that goes "through the hole"; then draw a zigzag (like the one in your picture) that crosses each edge of the decagon once. The two ends of the zigzag will end up on opposite "sides" of the original decagon, but can be joined "around the back". By converting the situation to one involving a "square donut" (akin to this one) you can probably do this all with straight lines, although that may be easier if the cross-section is a pentagon rather than a square...
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I wonder if your "square donut" will force kinks in lines, thereby breaking the conditions of the problem. Possible... but not certain...
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
You may well be right. Could be that there's a Z/2Z obstruction hiding in here somewhere.
$endgroup$
– John Hughes
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can certainly do it if your drawing is on a torus: draw a decagon that goes "through the hole"; then draw a zigzag (like the one in your picture) that crosses each edge of the decagon once. The two ends of the zigzag will end up on opposite "sides" of the original decagon, but can be joined "around the back". By converting the situation to one involving a "square donut" (akin to this one) you can probably do this all with straight lines, although that may be easier if the cross-section is a pentagon rather than a square...
$endgroup$
You can certainly do it if your drawing is on a torus: draw a decagon that goes "through the hole"; then draw a zigzag (like the one in your picture) that crosses each edge of the decagon once. The two ends of the zigzag will end up on opposite "sides" of the original decagon, but can be joined "around the back". By converting the situation to one involving a "square donut" (akin to this one) you can probably do this all with straight lines, although that may be easier if the cross-section is a pentagon rather than a square...
answered 6 hours ago
John HughesJohn Hughes
65.2k24293
65.2k24293
$begingroup$
I wonder if your "square donut" will force kinks in lines, thereby breaking the conditions of the problem. Possible... but not certain...
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
You may well be right. Could be that there's a Z/2Z obstruction hiding in here somewhere.
$endgroup$
– John Hughes
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I wonder if your "square donut" will force kinks in lines, thereby breaking the conditions of the problem. Possible... but not certain...
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
You may well be right. Could be that there's a Z/2Z obstruction hiding in here somewhere.
$endgroup$
– John Hughes
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
I wonder if your "square donut" will force kinks in lines, thereby breaking the conditions of the problem. Possible... but not certain...
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
I wonder if your "square donut" will force kinks in lines, thereby breaking the conditions of the problem. Possible... but not certain...
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
You may well be right. Could be that there's a Z/2Z obstruction hiding in here somewhere.
$endgroup$
– John Hughes
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
You may well be right. Could be that there's a Z/2Z obstruction hiding in here somewhere.
$endgroup$
– John Hughes
6 hours ago
add a comment |
Luiz Farias is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Luiz Farias is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Luiz Farias is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Luiz Farias is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3177522%2fproblem-of-parity-can-we-draw-a-closed-path-made-up-of-20-line-segments%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown