How to use @AuraEnabled base class method in Lightning Component?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
We are consolidating our common methods into an Abstract controller base class. Here's an example:
public abstract class CommunityControllerBase {
/*
Returns a select option list of Gender for use with lightning:combobox.
See: https://help.salesforce.com/articleView?id=000212327&type=1
*/
@AuraEnabled
public static List<SelectOption> getGenderPicklistEntries() {
List<SelectOption> options = new List<SelectOption>();
Schema.DescribeFieldResult fieldResult = Contact.Gender__c.getDescribe();
List<Schema.PicklistEntry> ple = fieldResult.getPicklistValues();
for (Schema.PicklistEntry f: ple) {
options.add(new SelectOption(f.getValue(), f.getLabel()));
}
return options;
}
}
We are extending the class and calling it from a Lightning Component component:
public with sharing AwesomeController extends CommunityControllerBase {
// some fancy code ...
}
I can use anonymous Apex to call the base class method getGenderPicklistEntries
and get an appropriate result via the extending class:
AwesomeController.getGenderPicklistEntries();
However, when we call the getGenderPicklistEntries
method from Lightning, we get an error:
Unable to find action 'getGenderPicklistEntries' on the controller of...
If I copy the method getGenderPicklistEntries
into the extending class and comment it out on the base class, it works (finds the method and pulls the list of genders).
Why can't our Lightning component see our base method in the base class, but can see it when it's copied in the extending class?
apex lightning-aura-components abstract
add a comment |
We are consolidating our common methods into an Abstract controller base class. Here's an example:
public abstract class CommunityControllerBase {
/*
Returns a select option list of Gender for use with lightning:combobox.
See: https://help.salesforce.com/articleView?id=000212327&type=1
*/
@AuraEnabled
public static List<SelectOption> getGenderPicklistEntries() {
List<SelectOption> options = new List<SelectOption>();
Schema.DescribeFieldResult fieldResult = Contact.Gender__c.getDescribe();
List<Schema.PicklistEntry> ple = fieldResult.getPicklistValues();
for (Schema.PicklistEntry f: ple) {
options.add(new SelectOption(f.getValue(), f.getLabel()));
}
return options;
}
}
We are extending the class and calling it from a Lightning Component component:
public with sharing AwesomeController extends CommunityControllerBase {
// some fancy code ...
}
I can use anonymous Apex to call the base class method getGenderPicklistEntries
and get an appropriate result via the extending class:
AwesomeController.getGenderPicklistEntries();
However, when we call the getGenderPicklistEntries
method from Lightning, we get an error:
Unable to find action 'getGenderPicklistEntries' on the controller of...
If I copy the method getGenderPicklistEntries
into the extending class and comment it out on the base class, it works (finds the method and pulls the list of genders).
Why can't our Lightning component see our base method in the base class, but can see it when it's copied in the extending class?
apex lightning-aura-components abstract
1
In addition to Jayant's answer, LWC answers this problem by allowing you to import methods from multiple classes at once, eliminating the need for "extends", since you can mixin any methods you'd like.
– sfdcfox
3 hours ago
add a comment |
We are consolidating our common methods into an Abstract controller base class. Here's an example:
public abstract class CommunityControllerBase {
/*
Returns a select option list of Gender for use with lightning:combobox.
See: https://help.salesforce.com/articleView?id=000212327&type=1
*/
@AuraEnabled
public static List<SelectOption> getGenderPicklistEntries() {
List<SelectOption> options = new List<SelectOption>();
Schema.DescribeFieldResult fieldResult = Contact.Gender__c.getDescribe();
List<Schema.PicklistEntry> ple = fieldResult.getPicklistValues();
for (Schema.PicklistEntry f: ple) {
options.add(new SelectOption(f.getValue(), f.getLabel()));
}
return options;
}
}
We are extending the class and calling it from a Lightning Component component:
public with sharing AwesomeController extends CommunityControllerBase {
// some fancy code ...
}
I can use anonymous Apex to call the base class method getGenderPicklistEntries
and get an appropriate result via the extending class:
AwesomeController.getGenderPicklistEntries();
However, when we call the getGenderPicklistEntries
method from Lightning, we get an error:
Unable to find action 'getGenderPicklistEntries' on the controller of...
If I copy the method getGenderPicklistEntries
into the extending class and comment it out on the base class, it works (finds the method and pulls the list of genders).
Why can't our Lightning component see our base method in the base class, but can see it when it's copied in the extending class?
apex lightning-aura-components abstract
We are consolidating our common methods into an Abstract controller base class. Here's an example:
public abstract class CommunityControllerBase {
/*
Returns a select option list of Gender for use with lightning:combobox.
See: https://help.salesforce.com/articleView?id=000212327&type=1
*/
@AuraEnabled
public static List<SelectOption> getGenderPicklistEntries() {
List<SelectOption> options = new List<SelectOption>();
Schema.DescribeFieldResult fieldResult = Contact.Gender__c.getDescribe();
List<Schema.PicklistEntry> ple = fieldResult.getPicklistValues();
for (Schema.PicklistEntry f: ple) {
options.add(new SelectOption(f.getValue(), f.getLabel()));
}
return options;
}
}
We are extending the class and calling it from a Lightning Component component:
public with sharing AwesomeController extends CommunityControllerBase {
// some fancy code ...
}
I can use anonymous Apex to call the base class method getGenderPicklistEntries
and get an appropriate result via the extending class:
AwesomeController.getGenderPicklistEntries();
However, when we call the getGenderPicklistEntries
method from Lightning, we get an error:
Unable to find action 'getGenderPicklistEntries' on the controller of...
If I copy the method getGenderPicklistEntries
into the extending class and comment it out on the base class, it works (finds the method and pulls the list of genders).
Why can't our Lightning component see our base method in the base class, but can see it when it's copied in the extending class?
apex lightning-aura-components abstract
apex lightning-aura-components abstract
asked 4 hours ago
Swisher SweetSwisher Sweet
2,02311444
2,02311444
1
In addition to Jayant's answer, LWC answers this problem by allowing you to import methods from multiple classes at once, eliminating the need for "extends", since you can mixin any methods you'd like.
– sfdcfox
3 hours ago
add a comment |
1
In addition to Jayant's answer, LWC answers this problem by allowing you to import methods from multiple classes at once, eliminating the need for "extends", since you can mixin any methods you'd like.
– sfdcfox
3 hours ago
1
1
In addition to Jayant's answer, LWC answers this problem by allowing you to import methods from multiple classes at once, eliminating the need for "extends", since you can mixin any methods you'd like.
– sfdcfox
3 hours ago
In addition to Jayant's answer, LWC answers this problem by allowing you to import methods from multiple classes at once, eliminating the need for "extends", since you can mixin any methods you'd like.
– sfdcfox
3 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Why can't our Lightning component see our base method in the base class, but can see it when it's copied in the extending class?
Because all @AuraEnabled
methods used from JS Controller in an Aura Component need to be static
. And that static
methods defined in a parent class are not extended or inherited in a subclass, but they are hidden. A very good mention of this can be found on the Overriding and Hiding Methods Java docs which states:
If a subclass defines a static method with the same signature as a static method in the superclass, then the method in the subclass hides the one in the superclass.
Static methods are always associated with the Class. So if in your component you have a AwesomeController
declared as a Controller, you will need to ensure that the method you are trying to invoke is available in that class.
1
You could add a method with@AuraEnabled
and the same signature, that simply calls the same method on the parent class. That's probably the best you're going to get. Thesuper
keyword won't even work in a static context.
– Charles T
3 hours ago
1
@JayantDas This question has been bothering me for a couple years and this answer puts my mind to ease. Thank you!
– Brian Miller
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "459"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f259988%2fhow-to-use-auraenabled-base-class-method-in-lightning-component%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Why can't our Lightning component see our base method in the base class, but can see it when it's copied in the extending class?
Because all @AuraEnabled
methods used from JS Controller in an Aura Component need to be static
. And that static
methods defined in a parent class are not extended or inherited in a subclass, but they are hidden. A very good mention of this can be found on the Overriding and Hiding Methods Java docs which states:
If a subclass defines a static method with the same signature as a static method in the superclass, then the method in the subclass hides the one in the superclass.
Static methods are always associated with the Class. So if in your component you have a AwesomeController
declared as a Controller, you will need to ensure that the method you are trying to invoke is available in that class.
1
You could add a method with@AuraEnabled
and the same signature, that simply calls the same method on the parent class. That's probably the best you're going to get. Thesuper
keyword won't even work in a static context.
– Charles T
3 hours ago
1
@JayantDas This question has been bothering me for a couple years and this answer puts my mind to ease. Thank you!
– Brian Miller
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Why can't our Lightning component see our base method in the base class, but can see it when it's copied in the extending class?
Because all @AuraEnabled
methods used from JS Controller in an Aura Component need to be static
. And that static
methods defined in a parent class are not extended or inherited in a subclass, but they are hidden. A very good mention of this can be found on the Overriding and Hiding Methods Java docs which states:
If a subclass defines a static method with the same signature as a static method in the superclass, then the method in the subclass hides the one in the superclass.
Static methods are always associated with the Class. So if in your component you have a AwesomeController
declared as a Controller, you will need to ensure that the method you are trying to invoke is available in that class.
1
You could add a method with@AuraEnabled
and the same signature, that simply calls the same method on the parent class. That's probably the best you're going to get. Thesuper
keyword won't even work in a static context.
– Charles T
3 hours ago
1
@JayantDas This question has been bothering me for a couple years and this answer puts my mind to ease. Thank you!
– Brian Miller
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Why can't our Lightning component see our base method in the base class, but can see it when it's copied in the extending class?
Because all @AuraEnabled
methods used from JS Controller in an Aura Component need to be static
. And that static
methods defined in a parent class are not extended or inherited in a subclass, but they are hidden. A very good mention of this can be found on the Overriding and Hiding Methods Java docs which states:
If a subclass defines a static method with the same signature as a static method in the superclass, then the method in the subclass hides the one in the superclass.
Static methods are always associated with the Class. So if in your component you have a AwesomeController
declared as a Controller, you will need to ensure that the method you are trying to invoke is available in that class.
Why can't our Lightning component see our base method in the base class, but can see it when it's copied in the extending class?
Because all @AuraEnabled
methods used from JS Controller in an Aura Component need to be static
. And that static
methods defined in a parent class are not extended or inherited in a subclass, but they are hidden. A very good mention of this can be found on the Overriding and Hiding Methods Java docs which states:
If a subclass defines a static method with the same signature as a static method in the superclass, then the method in the subclass hides the one in the superclass.
Static methods are always associated with the Class. So if in your component you have a AwesomeController
declared as a Controller, you will need to ensure that the method you are trying to invoke is available in that class.
edited 3 hours ago
answered 3 hours ago
Jayant DasJayant Das
19.2k21331
19.2k21331
1
You could add a method with@AuraEnabled
and the same signature, that simply calls the same method on the parent class. That's probably the best you're going to get. Thesuper
keyword won't even work in a static context.
– Charles T
3 hours ago
1
@JayantDas This question has been bothering me for a couple years and this answer puts my mind to ease. Thank you!
– Brian Miller
2 hours ago
add a comment |
1
You could add a method with@AuraEnabled
and the same signature, that simply calls the same method on the parent class. That's probably the best you're going to get. Thesuper
keyword won't even work in a static context.
– Charles T
3 hours ago
1
@JayantDas This question has been bothering me for a couple years and this answer puts my mind to ease. Thank you!
– Brian Miller
2 hours ago
1
1
You could add a method with
@AuraEnabled
and the same signature, that simply calls the same method on the parent class. That's probably the best you're going to get. The super
keyword won't even work in a static context.– Charles T
3 hours ago
You could add a method with
@AuraEnabled
and the same signature, that simply calls the same method on the parent class. That's probably the best you're going to get. The super
keyword won't even work in a static context.– Charles T
3 hours ago
1
1
@JayantDas This question has been bothering me for a couple years and this answer puts my mind to ease. Thank you!
– Brian Miller
2 hours ago
@JayantDas This question has been bothering me for a couple years and this answer puts my mind to ease. Thank you!
– Brian Miller
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Salesforce Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f259988%2fhow-to-use-auraenabled-base-class-method-in-lightning-component%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
In addition to Jayant's answer, LWC answers this problem by allowing you to import methods from multiple classes at once, eliminating the need for "extends", since you can mixin any methods you'd like.
– sfdcfox
3 hours ago