Can this PHP statement with a isset() check be simplified?












6















Needing to check whether the item exists in the array and either add to it or increase the value by the amount.



if(isset($this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId])) {
$this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] += $amount;
}else{
$this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] = $amount;
}


I have a feeling this can be simplified.










share|improve this question























  • What version of PHP?

    – Nick
    3 hours ago











  • Instead of trying to "simplify", go for code readability, you'll thank yourself later. Imho also go ahead and add a check for if is that property an array or not and add a handling for that scenario, cause php ain't letting you set an index for a boolean, now is it. 1 more vector of error squashed.

    – Mohd Abdul Mujib
    2 hours ago


















6















Needing to check whether the item exists in the array and either add to it or increase the value by the amount.



if(isset($this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId])) {
$this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] += $amount;
}else{
$this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] = $amount;
}


I have a feeling this can be simplified.










share|improve this question























  • What version of PHP?

    – Nick
    3 hours ago











  • Instead of trying to "simplify", go for code readability, you'll thank yourself later. Imho also go ahead and add a check for if is that property an array or not and add a handling for that scenario, cause php ain't letting you set an index for a boolean, now is it. 1 more vector of error squashed.

    – Mohd Abdul Mujib
    2 hours ago
















6












6








6


1






Needing to check whether the item exists in the array and either add to it or increase the value by the amount.



if(isset($this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId])) {
$this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] += $amount;
}else{
$this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] = $amount;
}


I have a feeling this can be simplified.










share|improve this question














Needing to check whether the item exists in the array and either add to it or increase the value by the amount.



if(isset($this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId])) {
$this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] += $amount;
}else{
$this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] = $amount;
}


I have a feeling this can be simplified.







php






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 4 hours ago









lukemhlukemh

2,15762135




2,15762135













  • What version of PHP?

    – Nick
    3 hours ago











  • Instead of trying to "simplify", go for code readability, you'll thank yourself later. Imho also go ahead and add a check for if is that property an array or not and add a handling for that scenario, cause php ain't letting you set an index for a boolean, now is it. 1 more vector of error squashed.

    – Mohd Abdul Mujib
    2 hours ago





















  • What version of PHP?

    – Nick
    3 hours ago











  • Instead of trying to "simplify", go for code readability, you'll thank yourself later. Imho also go ahead and add a check for if is that property an array or not and add a handling for that scenario, cause php ain't letting you set an index for a boolean, now is it. 1 more vector of error squashed.

    – Mohd Abdul Mujib
    2 hours ago



















What version of PHP?

– Nick
3 hours ago





What version of PHP?

– Nick
3 hours ago













Instead of trying to "simplify", go for code readability, you'll thank yourself later. Imho also go ahead and add a check for if is that property an array or not and add a handling for that scenario, cause php ain't letting you set an index for a boolean, now is it. 1 more vector of error squashed.

– Mohd Abdul Mujib
2 hours ago







Instead of trying to "simplify", go for code readability, you'll thank yourself later. Imho also go ahead and add a check for if is that property an array or not and add a handling for that scenario, cause php ain't letting you set an index for a boolean, now is it. 1 more vector of error squashed.

– Mohd Abdul Mujib
2 hours ago














3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















4














This method reduces it a bit, as you don't need the else statement or to assign amount twice.



if(!isset($this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId])) {
$this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] = 0;
}
$this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] += $amount;





share|improve this answer































    4














    Something that will work in all versions of PHP:



    @$this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] += $amount;


    The @ (error control operator) will cause PHP to ignore the error caused by the non-existent index, create the element (with an empty value) and then add $amount to it, resulting in a value of $amount (as the empty value gets converted to 0 as a number).




    Warning use of the @ operator could potentially make it harder to debug
    your code, as it will hide error messages that you may have
    needed to see (for example, even if $this doesn't exist, or there is
    no object element called _costRemovedByLineItem, PHP will create
    them along with the array). See the third case in my example code.




    Alternatively in PHP7 you can use the Null Coalescing Operator:



    $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] = ($this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] ?? 0) + $amount;


    And in PHP < 7 you can use the ternary operator



    $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] = (isset($this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId]) ? $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] : 0) + $amount;


    A shorter example of each:



    $amount = 4;
    @$a[5] += $amount;
    print_r($a);
    $b[6] = ($b[6] ?? 0) + $amount;
    print_r($b);
    @$c->x[5] += $amount;
    print_r($c);
    $d[3] = (isset($d[3]) ? $d[3] : 0) + $amount;
    print_r($d);


    Output:



    Array ( [5] => 4 ) 
    Array ( [6] => 4 )
    stdClass Object (
    [x] => Array ( [5] => 4 )
    )


    Demo on 3v4l.org






    share|improve this answer


























    • Now that is nice

      – Siavas
      3 hours ago






    • 1





      The null coalescing example is great imho, but the first example can be really problematic when debugging. I'd never recommend using @. What if _costRemovedByLineItem is deleted, or is an object. The code will fail without any error in anything under 7.1: 3v4l.org/pvvrX

      – Devon
      3 hours ago













    • @Devon the failure in your demo occurs when _costRemovedByLineItem is an object, but if it is OPs code will also fail as they are trying to use it as an array too.

      – Nick
      2 hours ago



















    0














    Ternary operators!



    $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] = 
    (isset($this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId])) ?
    $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] + $amount :
    $amount;


    One sec... is this actually simpler?



    But maybe...



    $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] = $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] ?? 0;
    $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] += $amount;


    This is for PHP 7+ only though. Or if you don't mind E_NOTICEs, from PHP 5.3:



    $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] = $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] ?: 0;
    $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] += $amount;


    One sec... this we just make the code harder to understand with not much improved?






    share|improve this answer
























    • Yeah, I agree all the solutions are a little shorter, but I am not sure they improve readability much.

      – lukemh
      3 hours ago











    • Yep, this is what I was trying to say :)

      – Siavas
      3 hours ago











    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    });
    });
    }, "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54432376%2fcan-this-php-statement-with-a-isset-check-be-simplified%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4














    This method reduces it a bit, as you don't need the else statement or to assign amount twice.



    if(!isset($this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId])) {
    $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] = 0;
    }
    $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] += $amount;





    share|improve this answer




























      4














      This method reduces it a bit, as you don't need the else statement or to assign amount twice.



      if(!isset($this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId])) {
      $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] = 0;
      }
      $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] += $amount;





      share|improve this answer


























        4












        4








        4







        This method reduces it a bit, as you don't need the else statement or to assign amount twice.



        if(!isset($this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId])) {
        $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] = 0;
        }
        $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] += $amount;





        share|improve this answer













        This method reduces it a bit, as you don't need the else statement or to assign amount twice.



        if(!isset($this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId])) {
        $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] = 0;
        }
        $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] += $amount;






        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 3 hours ago









        DevonDevon

        22.8k42746




        22.8k42746

























            4














            Something that will work in all versions of PHP:



            @$this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] += $amount;


            The @ (error control operator) will cause PHP to ignore the error caused by the non-existent index, create the element (with an empty value) and then add $amount to it, resulting in a value of $amount (as the empty value gets converted to 0 as a number).




            Warning use of the @ operator could potentially make it harder to debug
            your code, as it will hide error messages that you may have
            needed to see (for example, even if $this doesn't exist, or there is
            no object element called _costRemovedByLineItem, PHP will create
            them along with the array). See the third case in my example code.




            Alternatively in PHP7 you can use the Null Coalescing Operator:



            $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] = ($this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] ?? 0) + $amount;


            And in PHP < 7 you can use the ternary operator



            $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] = (isset($this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId]) ? $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] : 0) + $amount;


            A shorter example of each:



            $amount = 4;
            @$a[5] += $amount;
            print_r($a);
            $b[6] = ($b[6] ?? 0) + $amount;
            print_r($b);
            @$c->x[5] += $amount;
            print_r($c);
            $d[3] = (isset($d[3]) ? $d[3] : 0) + $amount;
            print_r($d);


            Output:



            Array ( [5] => 4 ) 
            Array ( [6] => 4 )
            stdClass Object (
            [x] => Array ( [5] => 4 )
            )


            Demo on 3v4l.org






            share|improve this answer


























            • Now that is nice

              – Siavas
              3 hours ago






            • 1





              The null coalescing example is great imho, but the first example can be really problematic when debugging. I'd never recommend using @. What if _costRemovedByLineItem is deleted, or is an object. The code will fail without any error in anything under 7.1: 3v4l.org/pvvrX

              – Devon
              3 hours ago













            • @Devon the failure in your demo occurs when _costRemovedByLineItem is an object, but if it is OPs code will also fail as they are trying to use it as an array too.

              – Nick
              2 hours ago
















            4














            Something that will work in all versions of PHP:



            @$this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] += $amount;


            The @ (error control operator) will cause PHP to ignore the error caused by the non-existent index, create the element (with an empty value) and then add $amount to it, resulting in a value of $amount (as the empty value gets converted to 0 as a number).




            Warning use of the @ operator could potentially make it harder to debug
            your code, as it will hide error messages that you may have
            needed to see (for example, even if $this doesn't exist, or there is
            no object element called _costRemovedByLineItem, PHP will create
            them along with the array). See the third case in my example code.




            Alternatively in PHP7 you can use the Null Coalescing Operator:



            $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] = ($this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] ?? 0) + $amount;


            And in PHP < 7 you can use the ternary operator



            $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] = (isset($this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId]) ? $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] : 0) + $amount;


            A shorter example of each:



            $amount = 4;
            @$a[5] += $amount;
            print_r($a);
            $b[6] = ($b[6] ?? 0) + $amount;
            print_r($b);
            @$c->x[5] += $amount;
            print_r($c);
            $d[3] = (isset($d[3]) ? $d[3] : 0) + $amount;
            print_r($d);


            Output:



            Array ( [5] => 4 ) 
            Array ( [6] => 4 )
            stdClass Object (
            [x] => Array ( [5] => 4 )
            )


            Demo on 3v4l.org






            share|improve this answer


























            • Now that is nice

              – Siavas
              3 hours ago






            • 1





              The null coalescing example is great imho, but the first example can be really problematic when debugging. I'd never recommend using @. What if _costRemovedByLineItem is deleted, or is an object. The code will fail without any error in anything under 7.1: 3v4l.org/pvvrX

              – Devon
              3 hours ago













            • @Devon the failure in your demo occurs when _costRemovedByLineItem is an object, but if it is OPs code will also fail as they are trying to use it as an array too.

              – Nick
              2 hours ago














            4












            4








            4







            Something that will work in all versions of PHP:



            @$this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] += $amount;


            The @ (error control operator) will cause PHP to ignore the error caused by the non-existent index, create the element (with an empty value) and then add $amount to it, resulting in a value of $amount (as the empty value gets converted to 0 as a number).




            Warning use of the @ operator could potentially make it harder to debug
            your code, as it will hide error messages that you may have
            needed to see (for example, even if $this doesn't exist, or there is
            no object element called _costRemovedByLineItem, PHP will create
            them along with the array). See the third case in my example code.




            Alternatively in PHP7 you can use the Null Coalescing Operator:



            $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] = ($this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] ?? 0) + $amount;


            And in PHP < 7 you can use the ternary operator



            $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] = (isset($this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId]) ? $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] : 0) + $amount;


            A shorter example of each:



            $amount = 4;
            @$a[5] += $amount;
            print_r($a);
            $b[6] = ($b[6] ?? 0) + $amount;
            print_r($b);
            @$c->x[5] += $amount;
            print_r($c);
            $d[3] = (isset($d[3]) ? $d[3] : 0) + $amount;
            print_r($d);


            Output:



            Array ( [5] => 4 ) 
            Array ( [6] => 4 )
            stdClass Object (
            [x] => Array ( [5] => 4 )
            )


            Demo on 3v4l.org






            share|improve this answer















            Something that will work in all versions of PHP:



            @$this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] += $amount;


            The @ (error control operator) will cause PHP to ignore the error caused by the non-existent index, create the element (with an empty value) and then add $amount to it, resulting in a value of $amount (as the empty value gets converted to 0 as a number).




            Warning use of the @ operator could potentially make it harder to debug
            your code, as it will hide error messages that you may have
            needed to see (for example, even if $this doesn't exist, or there is
            no object element called _costRemovedByLineItem, PHP will create
            them along with the array). See the third case in my example code.




            Alternatively in PHP7 you can use the Null Coalescing Operator:



            $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] = ($this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] ?? 0) + $amount;


            And in PHP < 7 you can use the ternary operator



            $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] = (isset($this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId]) ? $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] : 0) + $amount;


            A shorter example of each:



            $amount = 4;
            @$a[5] += $amount;
            print_r($a);
            $b[6] = ($b[6] ?? 0) + $amount;
            print_r($b);
            @$c->x[5] += $amount;
            print_r($c);
            $d[3] = (isset($d[3]) ? $d[3] : 0) + $amount;
            print_r($d);


            Output:



            Array ( [5] => 4 ) 
            Array ( [6] => 4 )
            stdClass Object (
            [x] => Array ( [5] => 4 )
            )


            Demo on 3v4l.org







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 2 hours ago

























            answered 3 hours ago









            NickNick

            27.3k111941




            27.3k111941













            • Now that is nice

              – Siavas
              3 hours ago






            • 1





              The null coalescing example is great imho, but the first example can be really problematic when debugging. I'd never recommend using @. What if _costRemovedByLineItem is deleted, or is an object. The code will fail without any error in anything under 7.1: 3v4l.org/pvvrX

              – Devon
              3 hours ago













            • @Devon the failure in your demo occurs when _costRemovedByLineItem is an object, but if it is OPs code will also fail as they are trying to use it as an array too.

              – Nick
              2 hours ago



















            • Now that is nice

              – Siavas
              3 hours ago






            • 1





              The null coalescing example is great imho, but the first example can be really problematic when debugging. I'd never recommend using @. What if _costRemovedByLineItem is deleted, or is an object. The code will fail without any error in anything under 7.1: 3v4l.org/pvvrX

              – Devon
              3 hours ago













            • @Devon the failure in your demo occurs when _costRemovedByLineItem is an object, but if it is OPs code will also fail as they are trying to use it as an array too.

              – Nick
              2 hours ago

















            Now that is nice

            – Siavas
            3 hours ago





            Now that is nice

            – Siavas
            3 hours ago




            1




            1





            The null coalescing example is great imho, but the first example can be really problematic when debugging. I'd never recommend using @. What if _costRemovedByLineItem is deleted, or is an object. The code will fail without any error in anything under 7.1: 3v4l.org/pvvrX

            – Devon
            3 hours ago







            The null coalescing example is great imho, but the first example can be really problematic when debugging. I'd never recommend using @. What if _costRemovedByLineItem is deleted, or is an object. The code will fail without any error in anything under 7.1: 3v4l.org/pvvrX

            – Devon
            3 hours ago















            @Devon the failure in your demo occurs when _costRemovedByLineItem is an object, but if it is OPs code will also fail as they are trying to use it as an array too.

            – Nick
            2 hours ago





            @Devon the failure in your demo occurs when _costRemovedByLineItem is an object, but if it is OPs code will also fail as they are trying to use it as an array too.

            – Nick
            2 hours ago











            0














            Ternary operators!



            $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] = 
            (isset($this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId])) ?
            $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] + $amount :
            $amount;


            One sec... is this actually simpler?



            But maybe...



            $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] = $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] ?? 0;
            $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] += $amount;


            This is for PHP 7+ only though. Or if you don't mind E_NOTICEs, from PHP 5.3:



            $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] = $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] ?: 0;
            $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] += $amount;


            One sec... this we just make the code harder to understand with not much improved?






            share|improve this answer
























            • Yeah, I agree all the solutions are a little shorter, but I am not sure they improve readability much.

              – lukemh
              3 hours ago











            • Yep, this is what I was trying to say :)

              – Siavas
              3 hours ago
















            0














            Ternary operators!



            $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] = 
            (isset($this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId])) ?
            $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] + $amount :
            $amount;


            One sec... is this actually simpler?



            But maybe...



            $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] = $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] ?? 0;
            $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] += $amount;


            This is for PHP 7+ only though. Or if you don't mind E_NOTICEs, from PHP 5.3:



            $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] = $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] ?: 0;
            $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] += $amount;


            One sec... this we just make the code harder to understand with not much improved?






            share|improve this answer
























            • Yeah, I agree all the solutions are a little shorter, but I am not sure they improve readability much.

              – lukemh
              3 hours ago











            • Yep, this is what I was trying to say :)

              – Siavas
              3 hours ago














            0












            0








            0







            Ternary operators!



            $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] = 
            (isset($this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId])) ?
            $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] + $amount :
            $amount;


            One sec... is this actually simpler?



            But maybe...



            $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] = $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] ?? 0;
            $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] += $amount;


            This is for PHP 7+ only though. Or if you don't mind E_NOTICEs, from PHP 5.3:



            $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] = $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] ?: 0;
            $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] += $amount;


            One sec... this we just make the code harder to understand with not much improved?






            share|improve this answer













            Ternary operators!



            $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] = 
            (isset($this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId])) ?
            $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] + $amount :
            $amount;


            One sec... is this actually simpler?



            But maybe...



            $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] = $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] ?? 0;
            $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] += $amount;


            This is for PHP 7+ only though. Or if you don't mind E_NOTICEs, from PHP 5.3:



            $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] = $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] ?: 0;
            $this->_costRemovedByLineItem[$objectId] += $amount;


            One sec... this we just make the code harder to understand with not much improved?







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 3 hours ago









            SiavasSiavas

            1,7161922




            1,7161922













            • Yeah, I agree all the solutions are a little shorter, but I am not sure they improve readability much.

              – lukemh
              3 hours ago











            • Yep, this is what I was trying to say :)

              – Siavas
              3 hours ago



















            • Yeah, I agree all the solutions are a little shorter, but I am not sure they improve readability much.

              – lukemh
              3 hours ago











            • Yep, this is what I was trying to say :)

              – Siavas
              3 hours ago

















            Yeah, I agree all the solutions are a little shorter, but I am not sure they improve readability much.

            – lukemh
            3 hours ago





            Yeah, I agree all the solutions are a little shorter, but I am not sure they improve readability much.

            – lukemh
            3 hours ago













            Yep, this is what I was trying to say :)

            – Siavas
            3 hours ago





            Yep, this is what I was trying to say :)

            – Siavas
            3 hours ago


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54432376%2fcan-this-php-statement-with-a-isset-check-be-simplified%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Knooppunt Holsloot

            Altaar (religie)

            Gregoriusmis