Estimate electrical frequency from clock shift
About 6 months ago I installed a solar power system with 2 Tesla Powerwalls for backup. Today, we got to test out the system with a power outage from an ice store in the southeast (still on battery power as I write this)
My kids came downstairs to tell me that I was time for bed (9PM), but when I looked at my phone, it was only 8:17PM. They were reading the time off the microwave. I checked the alarm clock in my room and it also read 9PM
I know that the way power is "pushed" around between solar, utility, and the Powerwall is by modifying the frequency of the ac signal. I also know that many digital clocks keep time via utility frequency.
So, my question is this - if our power went out at roughly 10AM, and by 9PM our digital clocks were off by almost 45 minutes, what frequency is the powerwall delivering backup power at? That large of a shift in time seems excessive (purely speculative).
frequency clock
New contributor
add a comment |
About 6 months ago I installed a solar power system with 2 Tesla Powerwalls for backup. Today, we got to test out the system with a power outage from an ice store in the southeast (still on battery power as I write this)
My kids came downstairs to tell me that I was time for bed (9PM), but when I looked at my phone, it was only 8:17PM. They were reading the time off the microwave. I checked the alarm clock in my room and it also read 9PM
I know that the way power is "pushed" around between solar, utility, and the Powerwall is by modifying the frequency of the ac signal. I also know that many digital clocks keep time via utility frequency.
So, my question is this - if our power went out at roughly 10AM, and by 9PM our digital clocks were off by almost 45 minutes, what frequency is the powerwall delivering backup power at? That large of a shift in time seems excessive (purely speculative).
frequency clock
New contributor
1
If the powerwall has line voltage outputs they should be set to line frequency. What does the powerwall specification/nameplate say? Are you 100% certain that the clocks didn't simply reset during the momentary dropout before the UPS/PTS kicked in?
– K H
13 hours ago
It maybe skipped pulses from switching between power sources. They all may have accurate 60 HZ +/- 0.1 % timing, but it can take several milliseconds to switch power sources. Most manufactures guarantee to switch in 10 mS or less, but even that is a 1 count error. That and built in errors on some equipment can easily add up to 45 minutes in 11 hours.
– Sparky256
13 hours ago
"I know that the way power is "pushed" around between solar, utility, and the Powerwall is by modifying the frequency of the ac signal." No. It's by modifying the voltage and phase. If you modified the frequency, you'd be going into and out of phase slowly!
– David Schwartz
10 hours ago
add a comment |
About 6 months ago I installed a solar power system with 2 Tesla Powerwalls for backup. Today, we got to test out the system with a power outage from an ice store in the southeast (still on battery power as I write this)
My kids came downstairs to tell me that I was time for bed (9PM), but when I looked at my phone, it was only 8:17PM. They were reading the time off the microwave. I checked the alarm clock in my room and it also read 9PM
I know that the way power is "pushed" around between solar, utility, and the Powerwall is by modifying the frequency of the ac signal. I also know that many digital clocks keep time via utility frequency.
So, my question is this - if our power went out at roughly 10AM, and by 9PM our digital clocks were off by almost 45 minutes, what frequency is the powerwall delivering backup power at? That large of a shift in time seems excessive (purely speculative).
frequency clock
New contributor
About 6 months ago I installed a solar power system with 2 Tesla Powerwalls for backup. Today, we got to test out the system with a power outage from an ice store in the southeast (still on battery power as I write this)
My kids came downstairs to tell me that I was time for bed (9PM), but when I looked at my phone, it was only 8:17PM. They were reading the time off the microwave. I checked the alarm clock in my room and it also read 9PM
I know that the way power is "pushed" around between solar, utility, and the Powerwall is by modifying the frequency of the ac signal. I also know that many digital clocks keep time via utility frequency.
So, my question is this - if our power went out at roughly 10AM, and by 9PM our digital clocks were off by almost 45 minutes, what frequency is the powerwall delivering backup power at? That large of a shift in time seems excessive (purely speculative).
frequency clock
frequency clock
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 13 hours ago
Matt Matt
341
341
New contributor
New contributor
1
If the powerwall has line voltage outputs they should be set to line frequency. What does the powerwall specification/nameplate say? Are you 100% certain that the clocks didn't simply reset during the momentary dropout before the UPS/PTS kicked in?
– K H
13 hours ago
It maybe skipped pulses from switching between power sources. They all may have accurate 60 HZ +/- 0.1 % timing, but it can take several milliseconds to switch power sources. Most manufactures guarantee to switch in 10 mS or less, but even that is a 1 count error. That and built in errors on some equipment can easily add up to 45 minutes in 11 hours.
– Sparky256
13 hours ago
"I know that the way power is "pushed" around between solar, utility, and the Powerwall is by modifying the frequency of the ac signal." No. It's by modifying the voltage and phase. If you modified the frequency, you'd be going into and out of phase slowly!
– David Schwartz
10 hours ago
add a comment |
1
If the powerwall has line voltage outputs they should be set to line frequency. What does the powerwall specification/nameplate say? Are you 100% certain that the clocks didn't simply reset during the momentary dropout before the UPS/PTS kicked in?
– K H
13 hours ago
It maybe skipped pulses from switching between power sources. They all may have accurate 60 HZ +/- 0.1 % timing, but it can take several milliseconds to switch power sources. Most manufactures guarantee to switch in 10 mS or less, but even that is a 1 count error. That and built in errors on some equipment can easily add up to 45 minutes in 11 hours.
– Sparky256
13 hours ago
"I know that the way power is "pushed" around between solar, utility, and the Powerwall is by modifying the frequency of the ac signal." No. It's by modifying the voltage and phase. If you modified the frequency, you'd be going into and out of phase slowly!
– David Schwartz
10 hours ago
1
1
If the powerwall has line voltage outputs they should be set to line frequency. What does the powerwall specification/nameplate say? Are you 100% certain that the clocks didn't simply reset during the momentary dropout before the UPS/PTS kicked in?
– K H
13 hours ago
If the powerwall has line voltage outputs they should be set to line frequency. What does the powerwall specification/nameplate say? Are you 100% certain that the clocks didn't simply reset during the momentary dropout before the UPS/PTS kicked in?
– K H
13 hours ago
It maybe skipped pulses from switching between power sources. They all may have accurate 60 HZ +/- 0.1 % timing, but it can take several milliseconds to switch power sources. Most manufactures guarantee to switch in 10 mS or less, but even that is a 1 count error. That and built in errors on some equipment can easily add up to 45 minutes in 11 hours.
– Sparky256
13 hours ago
It maybe skipped pulses from switching between power sources. They all may have accurate 60 HZ +/- 0.1 % timing, but it can take several milliseconds to switch power sources. Most manufactures guarantee to switch in 10 mS or less, but even that is a 1 count error. That and built in errors on some equipment can easily add up to 45 minutes in 11 hours.
– Sparky256
13 hours ago
"I know that the way power is "pushed" around between solar, utility, and the Powerwall is by modifying the frequency of the ac signal." No. It's by modifying the voltage and phase. If you modified the frequency, you'd be going into and out of phase slowly!
– David Schwartz
10 hours ago
"I know that the way power is "pushed" around between solar, utility, and the Powerwall is by modifying the frequency of the ac signal." No. It's by modifying the voltage and phase. If you modified the frequency, you'd be going into and out of phase slowly!
– David Schwartz
10 hours ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
45 minutes over a span of 660 minutes is an error of 6.8%. That's rather high. I would have expected a crystal-controlled frequency with an error of 100 ppm or less — i.e., less than 4 seconds over 11 hours.
And power isn't "pushed" by modifying the frequency per se, but rather the relative phase of the various sources.
add a comment |
The Powerwall 2 intentionally runs at between 64Hz and 65Hz when it is supplying power if its battery is full. This has the side-effect of making clocks run faster. It also causes UPSes to run on battery.
Now, the first question you might be asking is how it could be the case that the Powerwall is supplying power and its battery is full. Simple. The house has solar power and the solar power exceeds what the house is drawing. This will mean the Powerwall's battery will charge and, if this condition continues, eventually get full. Since the utility power is off, extra power can't be sold.
Now, you can quickly imagine a problem. The Powerwall's battery is full. The house isn't drawing as much power as the solar panels are creating. Somehow, the Powerwall has got to stop the grid-tie solar system from trying to supply it with power. It does this by bringing the frequency out of specification for the solar panel inverters. Typically, it takes a 64Hz to 65Hz frequency to do this.
So, essentially, this is how the Powerwall shuts the solar panels down when its battery is full and it cannot use all the power the solar system is trying to supply because it cannot sell it to the grid.
add a comment |
Units such as APC and Trip-Lite UPS detect 60+/-3 Hz as a power good and either reduce AC load outside this frequency or switch off AC charge to rely on battery backup. They also use voltage thresholds.
However these UPS units have a relatively short backup time compared to the PowerWall2 (PW2) . There are UPS's with +/-6Hz tolerance for input power detection such as the Minuteman.
Therefore to reduce non-essential loads that have short-term backup such as UPS, the PW2 runs > 65 HZ intentionally. or > 7.7% fast.
Your clocks were reading (21:00-10:00) * 60min/h = 660 minutes when you were expecting (20:17-10:00) * 60min/h = 617 min or 43 minutes fast = 43/617*100% = 7.0% fast which was the actual increase on the PW2 or 64.2 Hz.
The PW2 was 10% within the 65 Hz that I expected, but I do not have their actual specifications.
I am aware of this but cannot prove it.
1
So what you are saying is that the Power Wall 2 intentionally "activates" UPSes by running at a higher frequency? What’s the purpose of that? Wouldn’t it just drain the UPS pretty quickly, making the equipment connected to it shutdown?
– Michael
6 hours ago
@Michael: Indeed, and that (controlled) shutdown is intentional. UPS'es have two goals: to bridge short outages, and to cleanly shut down the connected computer(s) in case of longer outages. The PW2 isn't designed as a UPS and cannot shut down computers directly, but in this way it can delegate that function.
– MSalters
5 hours ago
1
This is almost right!
– David Schwartz
5 hours ago
But what if you want to supply your computers with the PW2?
– Michael
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("schematics", function () {
StackExchange.schematics.init();
});
}, "cicuitlab");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "135"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Matt is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f416828%2festimate-electrical-frequency-from-clock-shift%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
45 minutes over a span of 660 minutes is an error of 6.8%. That's rather high. I would have expected a crystal-controlled frequency with an error of 100 ppm or less — i.e., less than 4 seconds over 11 hours.
And power isn't "pushed" by modifying the frequency per se, but rather the relative phase of the various sources.
add a comment |
45 minutes over a span of 660 minutes is an error of 6.8%. That's rather high. I would have expected a crystal-controlled frequency with an error of 100 ppm or less — i.e., less than 4 seconds over 11 hours.
And power isn't "pushed" by modifying the frequency per se, but rather the relative phase of the various sources.
add a comment |
45 minutes over a span of 660 minutes is an error of 6.8%. That's rather high. I would have expected a crystal-controlled frequency with an error of 100 ppm or less — i.e., less than 4 seconds over 11 hours.
And power isn't "pushed" by modifying the frequency per se, but rather the relative phase of the various sources.
45 minutes over a span of 660 minutes is an error of 6.8%. That's rather high. I would have expected a crystal-controlled frequency with an error of 100 ppm or less — i.e., less than 4 seconds over 11 hours.
And power isn't "pushed" by modifying the frequency per se, but rather the relative phase of the various sources.
answered 13 hours ago
Dave Tweed♦Dave Tweed
118k9145256
118k9145256
add a comment |
add a comment |
The Powerwall 2 intentionally runs at between 64Hz and 65Hz when it is supplying power if its battery is full. This has the side-effect of making clocks run faster. It also causes UPSes to run on battery.
Now, the first question you might be asking is how it could be the case that the Powerwall is supplying power and its battery is full. Simple. The house has solar power and the solar power exceeds what the house is drawing. This will mean the Powerwall's battery will charge and, if this condition continues, eventually get full. Since the utility power is off, extra power can't be sold.
Now, you can quickly imagine a problem. The Powerwall's battery is full. The house isn't drawing as much power as the solar panels are creating. Somehow, the Powerwall has got to stop the grid-tie solar system from trying to supply it with power. It does this by bringing the frequency out of specification for the solar panel inverters. Typically, it takes a 64Hz to 65Hz frequency to do this.
So, essentially, this is how the Powerwall shuts the solar panels down when its battery is full and it cannot use all the power the solar system is trying to supply because it cannot sell it to the grid.
add a comment |
The Powerwall 2 intentionally runs at between 64Hz and 65Hz when it is supplying power if its battery is full. This has the side-effect of making clocks run faster. It also causes UPSes to run on battery.
Now, the first question you might be asking is how it could be the case that the Powerwall is supplying power and its battery is full. Simple. The house has solar power and the solar power exceeds what the house is drawing. This will mean the Powerwall's battery will charge and, if this condition continues, eventually get full. Since the utility power is off, extra power can't be sold.
Now, you can quickly imagine a problem. The Powerwall's battery is full. The house isn't drawing as much power as the solar panels are creating. Somehow, the Powerwall has got to stop the grid-tie solar system from trying to supply it with power. It does this by bringing the frequency out of specification for the solar panel inverters. Typically, it takes a 64Hz to 65Hz frequency to do this.
So, essentially, this is how the Powerwall shuts the solar panels down when its battery is full and it cannot use all the power the solar system is trying to supply because it cannot sell it to the grid.
add a comment |
The Powerwall 2 intentionally runs at between 64Hz and 65Hz when it is supplying power if its battery is full. This has the side-effect of making clocks run faster. It also causes UPSes to run on battery.
Now, the first question you might be asking is how it could be the case that the Powerwall is supplying power and its battery is full. Simple. The house has solar power and the solar power exceeds what the house is drawing. This will mean the Powerwall's battery will charge and, if this condition continues, eventually get full. Since the utility power is off, extra power can't be sold.
Now, you can quickly imagine a problem. The Powerwall's battery is full. The house isn't drawing as much power as the solar panels are creating. Somehow, the Powerwall has got to stop the grid-tie solar system from trying to supply it with power. It does this by bringing the frequency out of specification for the solar panel inverters. Typically, it takes a 64Hz to 65Hz frequency to do this.
So, essentially, this is how the Powerwall shuts the solar panels down when its battery is full and it cannot use all the power the solar system is trying to supply because it cannot sell it to the grid.
The Powerwall 2 intentionally runs at between 64Hz and 65Hz when it is supplying power if its battery is full. This has the side-effect of making clocks run faster. It also causes UPSes to run on battery.
Now, the first question you might be asking is how it could be the case that the Powerwall is supplying power and its battery is full. Simple. The house has solar power and the solar power exceeds what the house is drawing. This will mean the Powerwall's battery will charge and, if this condition continues, eventually get full. Since the utility power is off, extra power can't be sold.
Now, you can quickly imagine a problem. The Powerwall's battery is full. The house isn't drawing as much power as the solar panels are creating. Somehow, the Powerwall has got to stop the grid-tie solar system from trying to supply it with power. It does this by bringing the frequency out of specification for the solar panel inverters. Typically, it takes a 64Hz to 65Hz frequency to do this.
So, essentially, this is how the Powerwall shuts the solar panels down when its battery is full and it cannot use all the power the solar system is trying to supply because it cannot sell it to the grid.
answered 5 hours ago
David SchwartzDavid Schwartz
68138
68138
add a comment |
add a comment |
Units such as APC and Trip-Lite UPS detect 60+/-3 Hz as a power good and either reduce AC load outside this frequency or switch off AC charge to rely on battery backup. They also use voltage thresholds.
However these UPS units have a relatively short backup time compared to the PowerWall2 (PW2) . There are UPS's with +/-6Hz tolerance for input power detection such as the Minuteman.
Therefore to reduce non-essential loads that have short-term backup such as UPS, the PW2 runs > 65 HZ intentionally. or > 7.7% fast.
Your clocks were reading (21:00-10:00) * 60min/h = 660 minutes when you were expecting (20:17-10:00) * 60min/h = 617 min or 43 minutes fast = 43/617*100% = 7.0% fast which was the actual increase on the PW2 or 64.2 Hz.
The PW2 was 10% within the 65 Hz that I expected, but I do not have their actual specifications.
I am aware of this but cannot prove it.
1
So what you are saying is that the Power Wall 2 intentionally "activates" UPSes by running at a higher frequency? What’s the purpose of that? Wouldn’t it just drain the UPS pretty quickly, making the equipment connected to it shutdown?
– Michael
6 hours ago
@Michael: Indeed, and that (controlled) shutdown is intentional. UPS'es have two goals: to bridge short outages, and to cleanly shut down the connected computer(s) in case of longer outages. The PW2 isn't designed as a UPS and cannot shut down computers directly, but in this way it can delegate that function.
– MSalters
5 hours ago
1
This is almost right!
– David Schwartz
5 hours ago
But what if you want to supply your computers with the PW2?
– Michael
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Units such as APC and Trip-Lite UPS detect 60+/-3 Hz as a power good and either reduce AC load outside this frequency or switch off AC charge to rely on battery backup. They also use voltage thresholds.
However these UPS units have a relatively short backup time compared to the PowerWall2 (PW2) . There are UPS's with +/-6Hz tolerance for input power detection such as the Minuteman.
Therefore to reduce non-essential loads that have short-term backup such as UPS, the PW2 runs > 65 HZ intentionally. or > 7.7% fast.
Your clocks were reading (21:00-10:00) * 60min/h = 660 minutes when you were expecting (20:17-10:00) * 60min/h = 617 min or 43 minutes fast = 43/617*100% = 7.0% fast which was the actual increase on the PW2 or 64.2 Hz.
The PW2 was 10% within the 65 Hz that I expected, but I do not have their actual specifications.
I am aware of this but cannot prove it.
1
So what you are saying is that the Power Wall 2 intentionally "activates" UPSes by running at a higher frequency? What’s the purpose of that? Wouldn’t it just drain the UPS pretty quickly, making the equipment connected to it shutdown?
– Michael
6 hours ago
@Michael: Indeed, and that (controlled) shutdown is intentional. UPS'es have two goals: to bridge short outages, and to cleanly shut down the connected computer(s) in case of longer outages. The PW2 isn't designed as a UPS and cannot shut down computers directly, but in this way it can delegate that function.
– MSalters
5 hours ago
1
This is almost right!
– David Schwartz
5 hours ago
But what if you want to supply your computers with the PW2?
– Michael
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Units such as APC and Trip-Lite UPS detect 60+/-3 Hz as a power good and either reduce AC load outside this frequency or switch off AC charge to rely on battery backup. They also use voltage thresholds.
However these UPS units have a relatively short backup time compared to the PowerWall2 (PW2) . There are UPS's with +/-6Hz tolerance for input power detection such as the Minuteman.
Therefore to reduce non-essential loads that have short-term backup such as UPS, the PW2 runs > 65 HZ intentionally. or > 7.7% fast.
Your clocks were reading (21:00-10:00) * 60min/h = 660 minutes when you were expecting (20:17-10:00) * 60min/h = 617 min or 43 minutes fast = 43/617*100% = 7.0% fast which was the actual increase on the PW2 or 64.2 Hz.
The PW2 was 10% within the 65 Hz that I expected, but I do not have their actual specifications.
I am aware of this but cannot prove it.
Units such as APC and Trip-Lite UPS detect 60+/-3 Hz as a power good and either reduce AC load outside this frequency or switch off AC charge to rely on battery backup. They also use voltage thresholds.
However these UPS units have a relatively short backup time compared to the PowerWall2 (PW2) . There are UPS's with +/-6Hz tolerance for input power detection such as the Minuteman.
Therefore to reduce non-essential loads that have short-term backup such as UPS, the PW2 runs > 65 HZ intentionally. or > 7.7% fast.
Your clocks were reading (21:00-10:00) * 60min/h = 660 minutes when you were expecting (20:17-10:00) * 60min/h = 617 min or 43 minutes fast = 43/617*100% = 7.0% fast which was the actual increase on the PW2 or 64.2 Hz.
The PW2 was 10% within the 65 Hz that I expected, but I do not have their actual specifications.
I am aware of this but cannot prove it.
answered 12 hours ago
Sunnyskyguy EE75Sunnyskyguy EE75
63.5k22194
63.5k22194
1
So what you are saying is that the Power Wall 2 intentionally "activates" UPSes by running at a higher frequency? What’s the purpose of that? Wouldn’t it just drain the UPS pretty quickly, making the equipment connected to it shutdown?
– Michael
6 hours ago
@Michael: Indeed, and that (controlled) shutdown is intentional. UPS'es have two goals: to bridge short outages, and to cleanly shut down the connected computer(s) in case of longer outages. The PW2 isn't designed as a UPS and cannot shut down computers directly, but in this way it can delegate that function.
– MSalters
5 hours ago
1
This is almost right!
– David Schwartz
5 hours ago
But what if you want to supply your computers with the PW2?
– Michael
5 hours ago
add a comment |
1
So what you are saying is that the Power Wall 2 intentionally "activates" UPSes by running at a higher frequency? What’s the purpose of that? Wouldn’t it just drain the UPS pretty quickly, making the equipment connected to it shutdown?
– Michael
6 hours ago
@Michael: Indeed, and that (controlled) shutdown is intentional. UPS'es have two goals: to bridge short outages, and to cleanly shut down the connected computer(s) in case of longer outages. The PW2 isn't designed as a UPS and cannot shut down computers directly, but in this way it can delegate that function.
– MSalters
5 hours ago
1
This is almost right!
– David Schwartz
5 hours ago
But what if you want to supply your computers with the PW2?
– Michael
5 hours ago
1
1
So what you are saying is that the Power Wall 2 intentionally "activates" UPSes by running at a higher frequency? What’s the purpose of that? Wouldn’t it just drain the UPS pretty quickly, making the equipment connected to it shutdown?
– Michael
6 hours ago
So what you are saying is that the Power Wall 2 intentionally "activates" UPSes by running at a higher frequency? What’s the purpose of that? Wouldn’t it just drain the UPS pretty quickly, making the equipment connected to it shutdown?
– Michael
6 hours ago
@Michael: Indeed, and that (controlled) shutdown is intentional. UPS'es have two goals: to bridge short outages, and to cleanly shut down the connected computer(s) in case of longer outages. The PW2 isn't designed as a UPS and cannot shut down computers directly, but in this way it can delegate that function.
– MSalters
5 hours ago
@Michael: Indeed, and that (controlled) shutdown is intentional. UPS'es have two goals: to bridge short outages, and to cleanly shut down the connected computer(s) in case of longer outages. The PW2 isn't designed as a UPS and cannot shut down computers directly, but in this way it can delegate that function.
– MSalters
5 hours ago
1
1
This is almost right!
– David Schwartz
5 hours ago
This is almost right!
– David Schwartz
5 hours ago
But what if you want to supply your computers with the PW2?
– Michael
5 hours ago
But what if you want to supply your computers with the PW2?
– Michael
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Matt is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Matt is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Matt is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Matt is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f416828%2festimate-electrical-frequency-from-clock-shift%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
If the powerwall has line voltage outputs they should be set to line frequency. What does the powerwall specification/nameplate say? Are you 100% certain that the clocks didn't simply reset during the momentary dropout before the UPS/PTS kicked in?
– K H
13 hours ago
It maybe skipped pulses from switching between power sources. They all may have accurate 60 HZ +/- 0.1 % timing, but it can take several milliseconds to switch power sources. Most manufactures guarantee to switch in 10 mS or less, but even that is a 1 count error. That and built in errors on some equipment can easily add up to 45 minutes in 11 hours.
– Sparky256
13 hours ago
"I know that the way power is "pushed" around between solar, utility, and the Powerwall is by modifying the frequency of the ac signal." No. It's by modifying the voltage and phase. If you modified the frequency, you'd be going into and out of phase slowly!
– David Schwartz
10 hours ago