Is it possible to download Internet Explorer on my Mac running OS X El Capitan?












9















I need to connect to the website dictate.it, which only works with Internet Explorer.



Is it possible to access it in macOS?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Sara Pruneddu is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 8





    Not an answer to your question but please note that Internet Explorer has been deprecated and replaced by Microsoft Edge for 4 years now and will no longer be maintained in the near future no matter the operating system. If your service provider doesn't support any modern cross-platform browser (such as Mozilla Firefox or Google Chrome), it may be time for a change of provider or service.

    – zakinster
    6 hours ago






  • 2





    Interesting, going to dictate.it in Firefox on macOS produces... Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead Firefox detected a potential security threat and did not continue to dictate.it. If you visit this site, attackers could try to steal information like your passwords, emails, or credit card details.

    – user3439894
    3 hours ago








  • 2





    "Certificate name does not match input" - rather fishy, I didn't click through.

    – Tetsujin
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    @user3439894 Actually, their website's just misconfigured so that their SSL certificate is only valid for https://www.dictate.it.

    – Nonny Moose
    3 hours ago








  • 1





    @user3439894 It's only a minor certificate issue. The certificate only covers *.dictate.it which doesn't include dictate.it. You shouldn't have any issue with www.dictate.it or any other subdomain. Nothing really fishy but a bit incompetent.

    – zakinster
    3 hours ago


















9















I need to connect to the website dictate.it, which only works with Internet Explorer.



Is it possible to access it in macOS?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Sara Pruneddu is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 8





    Not an answer to your question but please note that Internet Explorer has been deprecated and replaced by Microsoft Edge for 4 years now and will no longer be maintained in the near future no matter the operating system. If your service provider doesn't support any modern cross-platform browser (such as Mozilla Firefox or Google Chrome), it may be time for a change of provider or service.

    – zakinster
    6 hours ago






  • 2





    Interesting, going to dictate.it in Firefox on macOS produces... Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead Firefox detected a potential security threat and did not continue to dictate.it. If you visit this site, attackers could try to steal information like your passwords, emails, or credit card details.

    – user3439894
    3 hours ago








  • 2





    "Certificate name does not match input" - rather fishy, I didn't click through.

    – Tetsujin
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    @user3439894 Actually, their website's just misconfigured so that their SSL certificate is only valid for https://www.dictate.it.

    – Nonny Moose
    3 hours ago








  • 1





    @user3439894 It's only a minor certificate issue. The certificate only covers *.dictate.it which doesn't include dictate.it. You shouldn't have any issue with www.dictate.it or any other subdomain. Nothing really fishy but a bit incompetent.

    – zakinster
    3 hours ago
















9












9








9


1






I need to connect to the website dictate.it, which only works with Internet Explorer.



Is it possible to access it in macOS?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Sara Pruneddu is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












I need to connect to the website dictate.it, which only works with Internet Explorer.



Is it possible to access it in macOS?







el-capitan internet-explorer






share|improve this question









New contributor




Sara Pruneddu is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Sara Pruneddu is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 9 hours ago









Nimesh Neema

16.5k74879




16.5k74879






New contributor




Sara Pruneddu is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 10 hours ago









Sara PrunedduSara Pruneddu

462




462




New contributor




Sara Pruneddu is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Sara Pruneddu is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Sara Pruneddu is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 8





    Not an answer to your question but please note that Internet Explorer has been deprecated and replaced by Microsoft Edge for 4 years now and will no longer be maintained in the near future no matter the operating system. If your service provider doesn't support any modern cross-platform browser (such as Mozilla Firefox or Google Chrome), it may be time for a change of provider or service.

    – zakinster
    6 hours ago






  • 2





    Interesting, going to dictate.it in Firefox on macOS produces... Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead Firefox detected a potential security threat and did not continue to dictate.it. If you visit this site, attackers could try to steal information like your passwords, emails, or credit card details.

    – user3439894
    3 hours ago








  • 2





    "Certificate name does not match input" - rather fishy, I didn't click through.

    – Tetsujin
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    @user3439894 Actually, their website's just misconfigured so that their SSL certificate is only valid for https://www.dictate.it.

    – Nonny Moose
    3 hours ago








  • 1





    @user3439894 It's only a minor certificate issue. The certificate only covers *.dictate.it which doesn't include dictate.it. You shouldn't have any issue with www.dictate.it or any other subdomain. Nothing really fishy but a bit incompetent.

    – zakinster
    3 hours ago
















  • 8





    Not an answer to your question but please note that Internet Explorer has been deprecated and replaced by Microsoft Edge for 4 years now and will no longer be maintained in the near future no matter the operating system. If your service provider doesn't support any modern cross-platform browser (such as Mozilla Firefox or Google Chrome), it may be time for a change of provider or service.

    – zakinster
    6 hours ago






  • 2





    Interesting, going to dictate.it in Firefox on macOS produces... Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead Firefox detected a potential security threat and did not continue to dictate.it. If you visit this site, attackers could try to steal information like your passwords, emails, or credit card details.

    – user3439894
    3 hours ago








  • 2





    "Certificate name does not match input" - rather fishy, I didn't click through.

    – Tetsujin
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    @user3439894 Actually, their website's just misconfigured so that their SSL certificate is only valid for https://www.dictate.it.

    – Nonny Moose
    3 hours ago








  • 1





    @user3439894 It's only a minor certificate issue. The certificate only covers *.dictate.it which doesn't include dictate.it. You shouldn't have any issue with www.dictate.it or any other subdomain. Nothing really fishy but a bit incompetent.

    – zakinster
    3 hours ago










8




8





Not an answer to your question but please note that Internet Explorer has been deprecated and replaced by Microsoft Edge for 4 years now and will no longer be maintained in the near future no matter the operating system. If your service provider doesn't support any modern cross-platform browser (such as Mozilla Firefox or Google Chrome), it may be time for a change of provider or service.

– zakinster
6 hours ago





Not an answer to your question but please note that Internet Explorer has been deprecated and replaced by Microsoft Edge for 4 years now and will no longer be maintained in the near future no matter the operating system. If your service provider doesn't support any modern cross-platform browser (such as Mozilla Firefox or Google Chrome), it may be time for a change of provider or service.

– zakinster
6 hours ago




2




2





Interesting, going to dictate.it in Firefox on macOS produces... Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead Firefox detected a potential security threat and did not continue to dictate.it. If you visit this site, attackers could try to steal information like your passwords, emails, or credit card details.

– user3439894
3 hours ago







Interesting, going to dictate.it in Firefox on macOS produces... Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead Firefox detected a potential security threat and did not continue to dictate.it. If you visit this site, attackers could try to steal information like your passwords, emails, or credit card details.

– user3439894
3 hours ago






2




2





"Certificate name does not match input" - rather fishy, I didn't click through.

– Tetsujin
3 hours ago





"Certificate name does not match input" - rather fishy, I didn't click through.

– Tetsujin
3 hours ago




1




1





@user3439894 Actually, their website's just misconfigured so that their SSL certificate is only valid for https://www.dictate.it.

– Nonny Moose
3 hours ago







@user3439894 Actually, their website's just misconfigured so that their SSL certificate is only valid for https://www.dictate.it.

– Nonny Moose
3 hours ago






1




1





@user3439894 It's only a minor certificate issue. The certificate only covers *.dictate.it which doesn't include dictate.it. You shouldn't have any issue with www.dictate.it or any other subdomain. Nothing really fishy but a bit incompetent.

– zakinster
3 hours ago







@user3439894 It's only a minor certificate issue. The certificate only covers *.dictate.it which doesn't include dictate.it. You shouldn't have any issue with www.dictate.it or any other subdomain. Nothing really fishy but a bit incompetent.

– zakinster
3 hours ago












5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















15














You can use a virtual machine and then use the images provided by Microsoft for use in testing older versions of IE. Requires no cost and you can delete it when you've finished using the site.



For free you can use VirtualBox, and then use one of the images from Microsoft.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




Ryan McDonough is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 5





    “Requires no licensing”—not correct; the licence, as you say, is “for use in testing”. Other uses are unauthorised.

    – eggyal
    7 hours ago











  • @eggyal true - changed it to 'no cost'. I think the license implications for a single person using it to fill out a form that requires IE (assuming this isn't a commercial setting) are minimal.

    – Ryan McDonough
    7 hours ago








  • 1





    My point really was that the OP’s intended use may not fall within that which is permitted under the licence, irrespective of the cost.

    – eggyal
    6 hours ago











  • @eggyal Yeah, I understand your point.

    – Ryan McDonough
    5 hours ago





















7














An alternative to virtualization (which is already covered in other answer) would be to use a Windows runtime environment emulation such as Wine (free & open-source).



PlayOnMac, the Mac version of PlayOnLinux, is a free graphical frontend for Wine and provides configuration templates to run the windows version of Internet Explorer.



Alternatively, you can also install and setup Wine manually. It's mostly dedicated for advanced system administrator but there is a packaged commercial front-end called CrossOver with customer support if you have some money to spend.



Although those solutions have a lot of benefits (no virtual machine, no Windows license needed, no cost), they may be really tricky to set up if it doesn't work out-of-the-box. In which case a windows virtual machine may be the easier way to go.



Edit: I managed to run Internet Explorer 8 on macOS Mojave using the trial version of CrossOver :
Internet Explorer 8 running natively on macOS Mojave using wine through CrossOver front-end



It may very well be the best solution if PlayOnMac doesn't work and you don't have the technical background necessary to setup Wine manually and you don't want to spend ~$200 on a Parallel Desktop + Windows 10 VM solution.






share|improve this answer


























  • IE should work out of the box, though.

    – user2531336
    5 hours ago











  • @user2531336 I just tried on macOS Mojave (10.14.4) with the last version of PlayOnMac and didn't manage to get IE8 to work using the most recent template, installation was stuck on "extracting file updateiesetup.exe". I'm sure it's possible to make it work with a bit of tweaking but it would require some time and knowledge of wine to troubleshoot. I still think it's the best overall solution but probably not for everyone, including OP.

    – zakinster
    4 hours ago





















3














Buy Parallels, buy Windows, install Parallels, install Windows, and now you can run Windows applications inside MacOSX, including Windows internals like Internet Explorer if I'm not mistaken.



Costs a few hundred dollars total, but you now have Windows running inside MacOSX and can run most Windows software directly. Some exceptions exist, especially late versions of DirectX and OpenGL aren't supported because of restrictions imposed by OSX (Apple's stonewalling on providing an up to date OpenGL implementation).






share|improve this answer































    3














    You could try to use some of the cloud tools that provide access to browsers via their service.



    Essentially you create an account with one of these services, and through their dashboard you can access a list of browsers that you can control through your own browser.





    One such example would be BrowserStack who have partnered with Microsoft to allow developers to test freely on Edge. They have a free plan which will allow you to access Internet Explorer and get your job done.



    There are other providers too that you could consider: Sauce Labs, Cross Browser Testing, Browser Ling




    Disclaimer: I used to be a BrowserStack employee







    share|improve this answer































      0














      You have a few options:





      • VM software and an IEDev image. Microsoft provides free (time-limited) versions of Windows with IE in the form of virtual machine images. You can get them here: https://developer.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-edge/tools/vms/


      • Install IE using WINE. The WINE project is a Windows compatibility layer for Unix-like systems including macOS. It's free but installing IE can be a pain. You can use tools like Winetricks to make installation easier. Good if you need an earlier version of IE than Microsoft's official solutions provide.


      • Change your useragent. In many cases, it used to be that most web browsers would work fine (or at least be operable) on sites optimised for IE only. However, developers couldn't be bothered to support anything outside of IE and would simply put a useragent-based whitelist in place. If you spoof your useragent to be IE, you might still be able to use the site. You can find many extensions for this in Firefox and Chrome/Chromium.






      share|improve this answer








      New contributor




      520 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





















      • All of this was already mentioned in other answers with more details. New answers should add new solutions.

        – Alexandre Aubrey
        1 hour ago



















      5 Answers
      5






      active

      oldest

      votes








      5 Answers
      5






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      15














      You can use a virtual machine and then use the images provided by Microsoft for use in testing older versions of IE. Requires no cost and you can delete it when you've finished using the site.



      For free you can use VirtualBox, and then use one of the images from Microsoft.






      share|improve this answer










      New contributor




      Ryan McDonough is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.
















      • 5





        “Requires no licensing”—not correct; the licence, as you say, is “for use in testing”. Other uses are unauthorised.

        – eggyal
        7 hours ago











      • @eggyal true - changed it to 'no cost'. I think the license implications for a single person using it to fill out a form that requires IE (assuming this isn't a commercial setting) are minimal.

        – Ryan McDonough
        7 hours ago








      • 1





        My point really was that the OP’s intended use may not fall within that which is permitted under the licence, irrespective of the cost.

        – eggyal
        6 hours ago











      • @eggyal Yeah, I understand your point.

        – Ryan McDonough
        5 hours ago


















      15














      You can use a virtual machine and then use the images provided by Microsoft for use in testing older versions of IE. Requires no cost and you can delete it when you've finished using the site.



      For free you can use VirtualBox, and then use one of the images from Microsoft.






      share|improve this answer










      New contributor




      Ryan McDonough is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.
















      • 5





        “Requires no licensing”—not correct; the licence, as you say, is “for use in testing”. Other uses are unauthorised.

        – eggyal
        7 hours ago











      • @eggyal true - changed it to 'no cost'. I think the license implications for a single person using it to fill out a form that requires IE (assuming this isn't a commercial setting) are minimal.

        – Ryan McDonough
        7 hours ago








      • 1





        My point really was that the OP’s intended use may not fall within that which is permitted under the licence, irrespective of the cost.

        – eggyal
        6 hours ago











      • @eggyal Yeah, I understand your point.

        – Ryan McDonough
        5 hours ago
















      15












      15








      15







      You can use a virtual machine and then use the images provided by Microsoft for use in testing older versions of IE. Requires no cost and you can delete it when you've finished using the site.



      For free you can use VirtualBox, and then use one of the images from Microsoft.






      share|improve this answer










      New contributor




      Ryan McDonough is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.










      You can use a virtual machine and then use the images provided by Microsoft for use in testing older versions of IE. Requires no cost and you can delete it when you've finished using the site.



      For free you can use VirtualBox, and then use one of the images from Microsoft.







      share|improve this answer










      New contributor




      Ryan McDonough is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited 7 hours ago





















      New contributor




      Ryan McDonough is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      answered 8 hours ago









      Ryan McDonoughRyan McDonough

      25916




      25916




      New contributor




      Ryan McDonough is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Ryan McDonough is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Ryan McDonough is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.








      • 5





        “Requires no licensing”—not correct; the licence, as you say, is “for use in testing”. Other uses are unauthorised.

        – eggyal
        7 hours ago











      • @eggyal true - changed it to 'no cost'. I think the license implications for a single person using it to fill out a form that requires IE (assuming this isn't a commercial setting) are minimal.

        – Ryan McDonough
        7 hours ago








      • 1





        My point really was that the OP’s intended use may not fall within that which is permitted under the licence, irrespective of the cost.

        – eggyal
        6 hours ago











      • @eggyal Yeah, I understand your point.

        – Ryan McDonough
        5 hours ago
















      • 5





        “Requires no licensing”—not correct; the licence, as you say, is “for use in testing”. Other uses are unauthorised.

        – eggyal
        7 hours ago











      • @eggyal true - changed it to 'no cost'. I think the license implications for a single person using it to fill out a form that requires IE (assuming this isn't a commercial setting) are minimal.

        – Ryan McDonough
        7 hours ago








      • 1





        My point really was that the OP’s intended use may not fall within that which is permitted under the licence, irrespective of the cost.

        – eggyal
        6 hours ago











      • @eggyal Yeah, I understand your point.

        – Ryan McDonough
        5 hours ago










      5




      5





      “Requires no licensing”—not correct; the licence, as you say, is “for use in testing”. Other uses are unauthorised.

      – eggyal
      7 hours ago





      “Requires no licensing”—not correct; the licence, as you say, is “for use in testing”. Other uses are unauthorised.

      – eggyal
      7 hours ago













      @eggyal true - changed it to 'no cost'. I think the license implications for a single person using it to fill out a form that requires IE (assuming this isn't a commercial setting) are minimal.

      – Ryan McDonough
      7 hours ago







      @eggyal true - changed it to 'no cost'. I think the license implications for a single person using it to fill out a form that requires IE (assuming this isn't a commercial setting) are minimal.

      – Ryan McDonough
      7 hours ago






      1




      1





      My point really was that the OP’s intended use may not fall within that which is permitted under the licence, irrespective of the cost.

      – eggyal
      6 hours ago





      My point really was that the OP’s intended use may not fall within that which is permitted under the licence, irrespective of the cost.

      – eggyal
      6 hours ago













      @eggyal Yeah, I understand your point.

      – Ryan McDonough
      5 hours ago







      @eggyal Yeah, I understand your point.

      – Ryan McDonough
      5 hours ago















      7














      An alternative to virtualization (which is already covered in other answer) would be to use a Windows runtime environment emulation such as Wine (free & open-source).



      PlayOnMac, the Mac version of PlayOnLinux, is a free graphical frontend for Wine and provides configuration templates to run the windows version of Internet Explorer.



      Alternatively, you can also install and setup Wine manually. It's mostly dedicated for advanced system administrator but there is a packaged commercial front-end called CrossOver with customer support if you have some money to spend.



      Although those solutions have a lot of benefits (no virtual machine, no Windows license needed, no cost), they may be really tricky to set up if it doesn't work out-of-the-box. In which case a windows virtual machine may be the easier way to go.



      Edit: I managed to run Internet Explorer 8 on macOS Mojave using the trial version of CrossOver :
      Internet Explorer 8 running natively on macOS Mojave using wine through CrossOver front-end



      It may very well be the best solution if PlayOnMac doesn't work and you don't have the technical background necessary to setup Wine manually and you don't want to spend ~$200 on a Parallel Desktop + Windows 10 VM solution.






      share|improve this answer


























      • IE should work out of the box, though.

        – user2531336
        5 hours ago











      • @user2531336 I just tried on macOS Mojave (10.14.4) with the last version of PlayOnMac and didn't manage to get IE8 to work using the most recent template, installation was stuck on "extracting file updateiesetup.exe". I'm sure it's possible to make it work with a bit of tweaking but it would require some time and knowledge of wine to troubleshoot. I still think it's the best overall solution but probably not for everyone, including OP.

        – zakinster
        4 hours ago


















      7














      An alternative to virtualization (which is already covered in other answer) would be to use a Windows runtime environment emulation such as Wine (free & open-source).



      PlayOnMac, the Mac version of PlayOnLinux, is a free graphical frontend for Wine and provides configuration templates to run the windows version of Internet Explorer.



      Alternatively, you can also install and setup Wine manually. It's mostly dedicated for advanced system administrator but there is a packaged commercial front-end called CrossOver with customer support if you have some money to spend.



      Although those solutions have a lot of benefits (no virtual machine, no Windows license needed, no cost), they may be really tricky to set up if it doesn't work out-of-the-box. In which case a windows virtual machine may be the easier way to go.



      Edit: I managed to run Internet Explorer 8 on macOS Mojave using the trial version of CrossOver :
      Internet Explorer 8 running natively on macOS Mojave using wine through CrossOver front-end



      It may very well be the best solution if PlayOnMac doesn't work and you don't have the technical background necessary to setup Wine manually and you don't want to spend ~$200 on a Parallel Desktop + Windows 10 VM solution.






      share|improve this answer


























      • IE should work out of the box, though.

        – user2531336
        5 hours ago











      • @user2531336 I just tried on macOS Mojave (10.14.4) with the last version of PlayOnMac and didn't manage to get IE8 to work using the most recent template, installation was stuck on "extracting file updateiesetup.exe". I'm sure it's possible to make it work with a bit of tweaking but it would require some time and knowledge of wine to troubleshoot. I still think it's the best overall solution but probably not for everyone, including OP.

        – zakinster
        4 hours ago
















      7












      7








      7







      An alternative to virtualization (which is already covered in other answer) would be to use a Windows runtime environment emulation such as Wine (free & open-source).



      PlayOnMac, the Mac version of PlayOnLinux, is a free graphical frontend for Wine and provides configuration templates to run the windows version of Internet Explorer.



      Alternatively, you can also install and setup Wine manually. It's mostly dedicated for advanced system administrator but there is a packaged commercial front-end called CrossOver with customer support if you have some money to spend.



      Although those solutions have a lot of benefits (no virtual machine, no Windows license needed, no cost), they may be really tricky to set up if it doesn't work out-of-the-box. In which case a windows virtual machine may be the easier way to go.



      Edit: I managed to run Internet Explorer 8 on macOS Mojave using the trial version of CrossOver :
      Internet Explorer 8 running natively on macOS Mojave using wine through CrossOver front-end



      It may very well be the best solution if PlayOnMac doesn't work and you don't have the technical background necessary to setup Wine manually and you don't want to spend ~$200 on a Parallel Desktop + Windows 10 VM solution.






      share|improve this answer















      An alternative to virtualization (which is already covered in other answer) would be to use a Windows runtime environment emulation such as Wine (free & open-source).



      PlayOnMac, the Mac version of PlayOnLinux, is a free graphical frontend for Wine and provides configuration templates to run the windows version of Internet Explorer.



      Alternatively, you can also install and setup Wine manually. It's mostly dedicated for advanced system administrator but there is a packaged commercial front-end called CrossOver with customer support if you have some money to spend.



      Although those solutions have a lot of benefits (no virtual machine, no Windows license needed, no cost), they may be really tricky to set up if it doesn't work out-of-the-box. In which case a windows virtual machine may be the easier way to go.



      Edit: I managed to run Internet Explorer 8 on macOS Mojave using the trial version of CrossOver :
      Internet Explorer 8 running natively on macOS Mojave using wine through CrossOver front-end



      It may very well be the best solution if PlayOnMac doesn't work and you don't have the technical background necessary to setup Wine manually and you don't want to spend ~$200 on a Parallel Desktop + Windows 10 VM solution.







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited 4 hours ago

























      answered 6 hours ago









      zakinsterzakinster

      21915




      21915













      • IE should work out of the box, though.

        – user2531336
        5 hours ago











      • @user2531336 I just tried on macOS Mojave (10.14.4) with the last version of PlayOnMac and didn't manage to get IE8 to work using the most recent template, installation was stuck on "extracting file updateiesetup.exe". I'm sure it's possible to make it work with a bit of tweaking but it would require some time and knowledge of wine to troubleshoot. I still think it's the best overall solution but probably not for everyone, including OP.

        – zakinster
        4 hours ago





















      • IE should work out of the box, though.

        – user2531336
        5 hours ago











      • @user2531336 I just tried on macOS Mojave (10.14.4) with the last version of PlayOnMac and didn't manage to get IE8 to work using the most recent template, installation was stuck on "extracting file updateiesetup.exe". I'm sure it's possible to make it work with a bit of tweaking but it would require some time and knowledge of wine to troubleshoot. I still think it's the best overall solution but probably not for everyone, including OP.

        – zakinster
        4 hours ago



















      IE should work out of the box, though.

      – user2531336
      5 hours ago





      IE should work out of the box, though.

      – user2531336
      5 hours ago













      @user2531336 I just tried on macOS Mojave (10.14.4) with the last version of PlayOnMac and didn't manage to get IE8 to work using the most recent template, installation was stuck on "extracting file updateiesetup.exe". I'm sure it's possible to make it work with a bit of tweaking but it would require some time and knowledge of wine to troubleshoot. I still think it's the best overall solution but probably not for everyone, including OP.

      – zakinster
      4 hours ago







      @user2531336 I just tried on macOS Mojave (10.14.4) with the last version of PlayOnMac and didn't manage to get IE8 to work using the most recent template, installation was stuck on "extracting file updateiesetup.exe". I'm sure it's possible to make it work with a bit of tweaking but it would require some time and knowledge of wine to troubleshoot. I still think it's the best overall solution but probably not for everyone, including OP.

      – zakinster
      4 hours ago













      3














      Buy Parallels, buy Windows, install Parallels, install Windows, and now you can run Windows applications inside MacOSX, including Windows internals like Internet Explorer if I'm not mistaken.



      Costs a few hundred dollars total, but you now have Windows running inside MacOSX and can run most Windows software directly. Some exceptions exist, especially late versions of DirectX and OpenGL aren't supported because of restrictions imposed by OSX (Apple's stonewalling on providing an up to date OpenGL implementation).






      share|improve this answer




























        3














        Buy Parallels, buy Windows, install Parallels, install Windows, and now you can run Windows applications inside MacOSX, including Windows internals like Internet Explorer if I'm not mistaken.



        Costs a few hundred dollars total, but you now have Windows running inside MacOSX and can run most Windows software directly. Some exceptions exist, especially late versions of DirectX and OpenGL aren't supported because of restrictions imposed by OSX (Apple's stonewalling on providing an up to date OpenGL implementation).






        share|improve this answer


























          3












          3








          3







          Buy Parallels, buy Windows, install Parallels, install Windows, and now you can run Windows applications inside MacOSX, including Windows internals like Internet Explorer if I'm not mistaken.



          Costs a few hundred dollars total, but you now have Windows running inside MacOSX and can run most Windows software directly. Some exceptions exist, especially late versions of DirectX and OpenGL aren't supported because of restrictions imposed by OSX (Apple's stonewalling on providing an up to date OpenGL implementation).






          share|improve this answer













          Buy Parallels, buy Windows, install Parallels, install Windows, and now you can run Windows applications inside MacOSX, including Windows internals like Internet Explorer if I'm not mistaken.



          Costs a few hundred dollars total, but you now have Windows running inside MacOSX and can run most Windows software directly. Some exceptions exist, especially late versions of DirectX and OpenGL aren't supported because of restrictions imposed by OSX (Apple's stonewalling on providing an up to date OpenGL implementation).







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 7 hours ago









          jwentingjwenting

          1572




          1572























              3














              You could try to use some of the cloud tools that provide access to browsers via their service.



              Essentially you create an account with one of these services, and through their dashboard you can access a list of browsers that you can control through your own browser.





              One such example would be BrowserStack who have partnered with Microsoft to allow developers to test freely on Edge. They have a free plan which will allow you to access Internet Explorer and get your job done.



              There are other providers too that you could consider: Sauce Labs, Cross Browser Testing, Browser Ling




              Disclaimer: I used to be a BrowserStack employee







              share|improve this answer




























                3














                You could try to use some of the cloud tools that provide access to browsers via their service.



                Essentially you create an account with one of these services, and through their dashboard you can access a list of browsers that you can control through your own browser.





                One such example would be BrowserStack who have partnered with Microsoft to allow developers to test freely on Edge. They have a free plan which will allow you to access Internet Explorer and get your job done.



                There are other providers too that you could consider: Sauce Labs, Cross Browser Testing, Browser Ling




                Disclaimer: I used to be a BrowserStack employee







                share|improve this answer


























                  3












                  3








                  3







                  You could try to use some of the cloud tools that provide access to browsers via their service.



                  Essentially you create an account with one of these services, and through their dashboard you can access a list of browsers that you can control through your own browser.





                  One such example would be BrowserStack who have partnered with Microsoft to allow developers to test freely on Edge. They have a free plan which will allow you to access Internet Explorer and get your job done.



                  There are other providers too that you could consider: Sauce Labs, Cross Browser Testing, Browser Ling




                  Disclaimer: I used to be a BrowserStack employee







                  share|improve this answer













                  You could try to use some of the cloud tools that provide access to browsers via their service.



                  Essentially you create an account with one of these services, and through their dashboard you can access a list of browsers that you can control through your own browser.





                  One such example would be BrowserStack who have partnered with Microsoft to allow developers to test freely on Edge. They have a free plan which will allow you to access Internet Explorer and get your job done.



                  There are other providers too that you could consider: Sauce Labs, Cross Browser Testing, Browser Ling




                  Disclaimer: I used to be a BrowserStack employee








                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 6 hours ago









                  SinsteinSinstein

                  867




                  867























                      0














                      You have a few options:





                      • VM software and an IEDev image. Microsoft provides free (time-limited) versions of Windows with IE in the form of virtual machine images. You can get them here: https://developer.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-edge/tools/vms/


                      • Install IE using WINE. The WINE project is a Windows compatibility layer for Unix-like systems including macOS. It's free but installing IE can be a pain. You can use tools like Winetricks to make installation easier. Good if you need an earlier version of IE than Microsoft's official solutions provide.


                      • Change your useragent. In many cases, it used to be that most web browsers would work fine (or at least be operable) on sites optimised for IE only. However, developers couldn't be bothered to support anything outside of IE and would simply put a useragent-based whitelist in place. If you spoof your useragent to be IE, you might still be able to use the site. You can find many extensions for this in Firefox and Chrome/Chromium.






                      share|improve this answer








                      New contributor




                      520 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.





















                      • All of this was already mentioned in other answers with more details. New answers should add new solutions.

                        – Alexandre Aubrey
                        1 hour ago
















                      0














                      You have a few options:





                      • VM software and an IEDev image. Microsoft provides free (time-limited) versions of Windows with IE in the form of virtual machine images. You can get them here: https://developer.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-edge/tools/vms/


                      • Install IE using WINE. The WINE project is a Windows compatibility layer for Unix-like systems including macOS. It's free but installing IE can be a pain. You can use tools like Winetricks to make installation easier. Good if you need an earlier version of IE than Microsoft's official solutions provide.


                      • Change your useragent. In many cases, it used to be that most web browsers would work fine (or at least be operable) on sites optimised for IE only. However, developers couldn't be bothered to support anything outside of IE and would simply put a useragent-based whitelist in place. If you spoof your useragent to be IE, you might still be able to use the site. You can find many extensions for this in Firefox and Chrome/Chromium.






                      share|improve this answer








                      New contributor




                      520 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.





















                      • All of this was already mentioned in other answers with more details. New answers should add new solutions.

                        – Alexandre Aubrey
                        1 hour ago














                      0












                      0








                      0







                      You have a few options:





                      • VM software and an IEDev image. Microsoft provides free (time-limited) versions of Windows with IE in the form of virtual machine images. You can get them here: https://developer.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-edge/tools/vms/


                      • Install IE using WINE. The WINE project is a Windows compatibility layer for Unix-like systems including macOS. It's free but installing IE can be a pain. You can use tools like Winetricks to make installation easier. Good if you need an earlier version of IE than Microsoft's official solutions provide.


                      • Change your useragent. In many cases, it used to be that most web browsers would work fine (or at least be operable) on sites optimised for IE only. However, developers couldn't be bothered to support anything outside of IE and would simply put a useragent-based whitelist in place. If you spoof your useragent to be IE, you might still be able to use the site. You can find many extensions for this in Firefox and Chrome/Chromium.






                      share|improve this answer








                      New contributor




                      520 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.










                      You have a few options:





                      • VM software and an IEDev image. Microsoft provides free (time-limited) versions of Windows with IE in the form of virtual machine images. You can get them here: https://developer.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-edge/tools/vms/


                      • Install IE using WINE. The WINE project is a Windows compatibility layer for Unix-like systems including macOS. It's free but installing IE can be a pain. You can use tools like Winetricks to make installation easier. Good if you need an earlier version of IE than Microsoft's official solutions provide.


                      • Change your useragent. In many cases, it used to be that most web browsers would work fine (or at least be operable) on sites optimised for IE only. However, developers couldn't be bothered to support anything outside of IE and would simply put a useragent-based whitelist in place. If you spoof your useragent to be IE, you might still be able to use the site. You can find many extensions for this in Firefox and Chrome/Chromium.







                      share|improve this answer








                      New contributor




                      520 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.









                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer






                      New contributor




                      520 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.









                      answered 3 hours ago









                      520520

                      101




                      101




                      New contributor




                      520 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.





                      New contributor





                      520 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.






                      520 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.













                      • All of this was already mentioned in other answers with more details. New answers should add new solutions.

                        – Alexandre Aubrey
                        1 hour ago



















                      • All of this was already mentioned in other answers with more details. New answers should add new solutions.

                        – Alexandre Aubrey
                        1 hour ago

















                      All of this was already mentioned in other answers with more details. New answers should add new solutions.

                      – Alexandre Aubrey
                      1 hour ago





                      All of this was already mentioned in other answers with more details. New answers should add new solutions.

                      – Alexandre Aubrey
                      1 hour ago



                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Floris Gerts

                      Dam (waterkering)

                      Gregoriusmis