Can a sorcerer use careful spell on himself?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
$begingroup$
Careful spell metamagic states “other creatures”.
When you cast a spell that forces other creatures to make a saving
throw, you can protect some of those creatures from the spell full
force. To do so, you spend 1 sorcery point and choose a member of
those creatures up to your Charisma modifier (minimum of one
creature). A chosen creature automatically succeeds on its saving
throw against the spell.
Does that mean the caster can’t use it to protect himself from the effects of the spell if you happen to cast an AoE spell like Ice storm?
dnd-5e spells metamagic
edited 3 hours ago
Rubiksmoose
61.9k10297455
asked 3 hours ago
Jorge CórdobaJorge Córdoba
409311
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Careful spell metamagic states “other creatures”.
When you cast a spell that forces other creatures to make a saving
throw, you can protect some of those creatures from the spell full
force. To do so, you spend 1 sorcery point and choose a member of
those creatures up to your Charisma modifier (minimum of one
creature). A chosen creature automatically succeeds on its saving
throw against the spell.
Does that mean the caster can’t use it to protect himself from the effects of the spell if you happen to cast an AoE spell like Ice storm?
dnd-5e spells metamagic
edited 3 hours ago
Rubiksmoose
61.9k10297455
asked 3 hours ago
Jorge CórdobaJorge Córdoba
409311
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Careful spell metamagic states “other creatures”.
When you cast a spell that forces other creatures to make a saving
throw, you can protect some of those creatures from the spell full
force. To do so, you spend 1 sorcery point and choose a member of
those creatures up to your Charisma modifier (minimum of one
creature). A chosen creature automatically succeeds on its saving
throw against the spell.
Does that mean the caster can’t use it to protect himself from the effects of the spell if you happen to cast an AoE spell like Ice storm?
dnd-5e spells metamagic
edited 3 hours ago
Rubiksmoose
61.9k10297455
asked 3 hours ago
Jorge CórdobaJorge Córdoba
409311
$endgroup$
Careful spell metamagic states “other creatures”.
When you cast a spell that forces other creatures to make a saving
throw, you can protect some of those creatures from the spell full
force. To do so, you spend 1 sorcery point and choose a member of
those creatures up to your Charisma modifier (minimum of one
creature). A chosen creature automatically succeeds on its saving
throw against the spell.
Does that mean the caster can’t use it to protect himself from the effects of the spell if you happen to cast an AoE spell like Ice storm?
dnd-5e spells metamagic
dnd-5e spells metamagic
edited 3 hours ago
Rubiksmoose
61.9k10297455
asked 3 hours ago
Jorge CórdobaJorge Córdoba
409311
edited 3 hours ago
Rubiksmoose
61.9k10297455
asked 3 hours ago
Jorge CórdobaJorge Córdoba
409311
edited 3 hours ago
Rubiksmoose
61.9k10297455
edited 3 hours ago
Rubiksmoose
61.9k10297455
edited 3 hours ago
Rubiksmoose
61.9k10297455
61.9k10297455
asked 3 hours ago
Jorge CórdobaJorge Córdoba
409311
asked 3 hours ago
Jorge CórdobaJorge Córdoba
409311
asked 3 hours ago
Jorge CórdobaJorge Córdoba
409311
409311
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Yes, you can't protect yourself
The rule is consistent with using 'other creature' to mean 'you are not included', so with this wording you can't use Careful spell metamagic to protect yourself.
However,
I don't see any problem if you ruled the caster can be included. I've DM'ed and played sorcerer with Careful Spell allowed on themselves and there is no problem at all.
This seems intentional. The wording of Sculpt Spells from Evocation Wizard also suggest the same thing:
When you cast an evocation spell that affects other creatures that you can see, you can choose a number of them equal to 1 + the spell’s level.
and the tweet from Jeremy Crawford seems to suggest so
Careful Spell and Sculpt Spells work as intended.
answered 2 hours ago
VylixVylix
14.4k260163
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I could argue that it is definitely intentional because at three different times it references other creatures. "Other creatures", "some of those creatures", "choose a number of those creatures"
$endgroup$
– Blake Steel
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@BlakeSteel no. The 'those creatures' refer to the group mentioned previously. The previous group has been defined with an error (excluding the caster), thus all references to the defined group is error. Both wording does not clarify better whether it's intentional or not.
$endgroup$
– Vylix
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f145500%2fcan-a-sorcerer-use-careful-spell-on-himself%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Yes, you can't protect yourself
The rule is consistent with using 'other creature' to mean 'you are not included', so with this wording you can't use Careful spell metamagic to protect yourself.
However,
I don't see any problem if you ruled the caster can be included. I've DM'ed and played sorcerer with Careful Spell allowed on themselves and there is no problem at all.
This seems intentional. The wording of Sculpt Spells from Evocation Wizard also suggest the same thing:
When you cast an evocation spell that affects other creatures that you can see, you can choose a number of them equal to 1 + the spell’s level.
and the tweet from Jeremy Crawford seems to suggest so
Careful Spell and Sculpt Spells work as intended.
answered 2 hours ago
VylixVylix
14.4k260163
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I could argue that it is definitely intentional because at three different times it references other creatures. "Other creatures", "some of those creatures", "choose a number of those creatures"
$endgroup$
– Blake Steel
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@BlakeSteel no. The 'those creatures' refer to the group mentioned previously. The previous group has been defined with an error (excluding the caster), thus all references to the defined group is error. Both wording does not clarify better whether it's intentional or not.
$endgroup$
– Vylix
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, you can't protect yourself
The rule is consistent with using 'other creature' to mean 'you are not included', so with this wording you can't use Careful spell metamagic to protect yourself.
However,
I don't see any problem if you ruled the caster can be included. I've DM'ed and played sorcerer with Careful Spell allowed on themselves and there is no problem at all.
This seems intentional. The wording of Sculpt Spells from Evocation Wizard also suggest the same thing:
When you cast an evocation spell that affects other creatures that you can see, you can choose a number of them equal to 1 + the spell’s level.
and the tweet from Jeremy Crawford seems to suggest so
Careful Spell and Sculpt Spells work as intended.
answered 2 hours ago
VylixVylix
14.4k260163
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I could argue that it is definitely intentional because at three different times it references other creatures. "Other creatures", "some of those creatures", "choose a number of those creatures"
$endgroup$
– Blake Steel
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@BlakeSteel no. The 'those creatures' refer to the group mentioned previously. The previous group has been defined with an error (excluding the caster), thus all references to the defined group is error. Both wording does not clarify better whether it's intentional or not.
$endgroup$
– Vylix
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, you can't protect yourself
The rule is consistent with using 'other creature' to mean 'you are not included', so with this wording you can't use Careful spell metamagic to protect yourself.
However,
I don't see any problem if you ruled the caster can be included. I've DM'ed and played sorcerer with Careful Spell allowed on themselves and there is no problem at all.
This seems intentional. The wording of Sculpt Spells from Evocation Wizard also suggest the same thing:
When you cast an evocation spell that affects other creatures that you can see, you can choose a number of them equal to 1 + the spell’s level.
and the tweet from Jeremy Crawford seems to suggest so
Careful Spell and Sculpt Spells work as intended.
answered 2 hours ago
VylixVylix
14.4k260163
$endgroup$
Yes, you can't protect yourself
The rule is consistent with using 'other creature' to mean 'you are not included', so with this wording you can't use Careful spell metamagic to protect yourself.
However,
I don't see any problem if you ruled the caster can be included. I've DM'ed and played sorcerer with Careful Spell allowed on themselves and there is no problem at all.
This seems intentional. The wording of Sculpt Spells from Evocation Wizard also suggest the same thing:
When you cast an evocation spell that affects other creatures that you can see, you can choose a number of them equal to 1 + the spell’s level.
and the tweet from Jeremy Crawford seems to suggest so
Careful Spell and Sculpt Spells work as intended.
answered 2 hours ago
VylixVylix
14.4k260163
edited 2 hours ago
answered 2 hours ago
VylixVylix
14.4k260163
answered 2 hours ago
VylixVylix
14.4k260163
answered 2 hours ago
VylixVylix
14.4k260163
14.4k260163
$begingroup$
I could argue that it is definitely intentional because at three different times it references other creatures. "Other creatures", "some of those creatures", "choose a number of those creatures"
$endgroup$
– Blake Steel
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@BlakeSteel no. The 'those creatures' refer to the group mentioned previously. The previous group has been defined with an error (excluding the caster), thus all references to the defined group is error. Both wording does not clarify better whether it's intentional or not.
$endgroup$
– Vylix
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I could argue that it is definitely intentional because at three different times it references other creatures. "Other creatures", "some of those creatures", "choose a number of those creatures"
$endgroup$
– Blake Steel
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@BlakeSteel no. The 'those creatures' refer to the group mentioned previously. The previous group has been defined with an error (excluding the caster), thus all references to the defined group is error. Both wording does not clarify better whether it's intentional or not.
$endgroup$
– Vylix
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
I could argue that it is definitely intentional because at three different times it references other creatures. "Other creatures", "some of those creatures", "choose a number of those creatures"
$endgroup$
– Blake Steel
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
I could argue that it is definitely intentional because at three different times it references other creatures. "Other creatures", "some of those creatures", "choose a number of those creatures"
$endgroup$
– Blake Steel
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@BlakeSteel no. The 'those creatures' refer to the group mentioned previously. The previous group has been defined with an error (excluding the caster), thus all references to the defined group is error. Both wording does not clarify better whether it's intentional or not.
$endgroup$
– Vylix
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@BlakeSteel no. The 'those creatures' refer to the group mentioned previously. The previous group has been defined with an error (excluding the caster), thus all references to the defined group is error. Both wording does not clarify better whether it's intentional or not.
$endgroup$
– Vylix
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f145500%2fcan-a-sorcerer-use-careful-spell-on-himself%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
